Literature DB >> 25850890

Effect of TIPS placement on portal and splanchnic arterial blood flow in 4-dimensional flow MRI.

Zoran Stankovic1, Martin Rössle, Wulf Euringer, Michael Schultheiss, Riad Salem, Alex Barker, James Carr, Mathias Langer, Michael Markl, Jeremy D Collins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess changes in portal and splanchnic arterial haemodynamics in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI, a non-invasive, non-contrast imaging technique.
METHODS: Eleven patients undergoing TIPS implantation were enrolled. K-t GRAPPA accelerated non-contrast 4D flow MRI of the liver vasculature was applied with acceleration factor R = 5 at 3Tesla. Flow analysis included three-dimensional (3D) blood flow visualization using time-resolved 3D particle traces and semi-quantitative flow pattern grading. Quantitative evaluation entailed peak velocities and net flows throughout the arterial and portal venous (PV) systems. MRI measurements were taken within 24 h before and 4 weeks after TIPS placement.
RESULTS: Three-dimensional flow visualization with 4D flow MRI revealed good image quality with minor limitations in PV flow. Quantitative analysis revealed a significant increase in PV flow (562 ± 373 ml/min before vs. 1831 ± 965 ml/min after TIPS), in the hepatic artery (176 ± 132 ml/min vs. 354 ± 140 ml/min) and combined flow in splenic and superior mesenteric arteries (770 ml/min vs. 1064 ml/min). Shunt-flow assessment demonstrated stenoses in two patients confirmed and treated at TIPS revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Four-dimensional flow MRI might have the potential to give new information about the effect of TIPS placement on hepatic perfusion. It may explain some unexpected findings in clinical observation studies. KEY POINTS: • 4D flow MRI, a non-invasive, non-contrast imaging technique, is feasible after TIPS. • Provides visualization and quantification of hepatic arterial, portal venous, collateral and TIPS haemodynamics. • Better understanding of liver blood flow changes after TIPS and patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850890     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3663-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  32 in total

1.  Usefulness of 4D MRI flow imaging to control TIPS function.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Philipp Blanke; Michael Markl
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  MR-based visualization and quantification of three-dimensional flow characteristics in the portal venous system.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Alex Frydrychowicz; Zoltan Csatari; Elisabeth Panther; Peter Deibert; Wulf Euringer; Wolfgang Kreisel; Maximilian Russe; Simon Bauer; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization.

Authors:  Jelena Bock; Alex Frydrychowicz; Aurélien F Stalder; Thorsten A Bley; Hans Burkhardt; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  A feasibility study to evaluate splanchnic arterial and venous hemodynamics by flow-sensitive 4D MRI compared with Doppler ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis and controls.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Zoltan Csatari; Peter Deibert; Wulf Euringer; Bernd Jung; Wolfgang Kreisel; Julia Geiger; Maximilian F Russe; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data.

Authors:  P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Portal blood flow in cirrhosis of the liver.

Authors:  A H Moreno; A R Burchell; L M Rousselot; W F Panke; F Slafsky; J H Burke
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  In vivo validation of 4D flow MRI for assessing the hemodynamics of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Alex Frydrychowicz; Eric Niespodzany; Ben R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging flowmetry of portal and hepatic veins in patients following hepatectomy.

Authors:  A Nanashima; S Shibasaki; I Sakamoto; E Sueyoshi; Y Sumida; T Abo; T Nagasaki; T Sawai; T Yasutake; T Nagayasu
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.828

Review 9.  Vasoactive factors and hemodynamic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Angelo Gatta; Massimo Bolognesi; Carlo Merkel
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2007-10-24

Review 10.  4D flow imaging with MRI.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Bradley D Allen; Julio Garcia; Kelly B Jarvis; Michael Markl
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Pim van Ooij; Alex Powell; James Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Aaron Fischman; Thomas Schiano; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-14

4.  Longitudinal Monitoring of Hepatic Blood Flow before and after TIPS by Using 4D-Flow MR Imaging.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Kevin M Johnson; Michael A Woods; Orhan Ozkan; Utaroh Motosugi; Oliver Wieben; Scott B Reeder; Harald Kramer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparison of radial 4D Flow-MRI with perivascular ultrasound to quantify blood flow in the abdomen and introduction of a porcine model of pre-hepatic portal hypertension.

Authors:  A Frydrychowicz; A Roldan-Alzate; E Winslow; D Consigny; C A Campo; U Motosugi; K M Johnson; O Wieben; S B Reeder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  4D Flow MRI in the portal venous system: imaging and analysis methods, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ryota Hyodo; Yasuo Takehara; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 6.313

7.  4D flow MR imaging of the portal venous system: a feasibility study in children.

Authors:  Keyur Parekh; Michael Markl; Michael Rose; Susanne Schnell; Andrada Popescu; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Combined transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal hypertension.

Authors:  Bin Qiu; Meng-Fei Zhao; Zhen-Dong Yue; Hong-Wei Zhao; Lei Wang; Zhen-Hua Fan; Fu-Liang He; Shan Dai; Jian-Nan Yao; Fu-Quan Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Four-Dimensional Flow MRI of Abdominal Veins: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Simon O Haarbye; Michael B Nielsen; Adam E Hansen; Carsten A Lauridsen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24

10.  Is de novo hepatocellular carcinoma after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt increased?

Authors:  A Hüsing-Kabar; T Meister; M Köhler; W Domschke; I Kabar; C Wilms; B Hild; H H Schmidt; H S Heinzow
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.