Literature DB >> 8916033

Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging.

L Wigström1, L Sjöqvist, B Wranne.   

Abstract

A conventional 3D phase contrast acquisition generates images with good spatial resolution, but often gives rise to artifacts due to pulsatile flow. 2D cine phase contrast, on the other hand, can register dynamic flow, but has a poor spatial resolution perpendicular to the imaging plane. A combination of both high spatial and temporal resolution may be advantageous in some cases, both in quantitative flow measurements and in MR angiography. The described 3D cine phase contrast pulse sequence creates a temporally resolved series of 3D data sets with velocity encoded data.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8916033     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910360521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  63 in total

1.  Three dimensional flow in the human left atrium.

Authors:  A Fyrenius; L Wigström; T Ebbers; M Karlsson; J Engvall; A F Bolger
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Alexander Berger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Maximilian F Russe; Jelena Bock; Andreas Harloff; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Time-resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer; Thomas A Hope; Murat Aksoy; Marcus T Alley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T.

Authors:  S Wetzel; S Meckel; A Frydrychowicz; L Bonati; E-W Radue; K Scheffler; J Hennig; M Markl
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Intracardiac flow visualization: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Michael Markl; José Luis Moya Mur; Alex Barker; Covadonga Fernández-Golfín; Patrizio Lancellotti; José Luis Zamorano Gómez
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Thorsten A Bley; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler; Benjamin R Landgraf; Daniel Consigny; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Impact of age, sex, and global function on normal aortic hemodynamics.

Authors:  Michael B Scott; Hyungkyu Huh; Pim van Ooij; Vincent Chen; Brenda Herrera; Mohammed Elbaz; Patrick McCarthy; S Chris Malaisrie; James Carr; Paul W M Fedak; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  4D spiral imaging of flows in stenotic phantoms and subjects with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M J Negahdar; Mo Kadbi; Michael Kendrick; Marcus F Stoddard; Amir A Amini
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.