Tetsuro Sekine1,2, Ryo Takagi3, Yasuo Amano3, Yasuo Murai4, Erika Orita3, Yoshio Matsumura3, Shin-Ichiro Kumita3. 1. Department of Medical Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, 100 Rämistrasse, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland. tetsuro.sekine@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan. tetsuro.sekine@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to assess the feasibility of using time-resolved 3D phase-contrast (4D flow) MRI to characterize extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass. METHODS: We enrolled 32 patients who underwentEC-IC bypass (15 men, 17 women; mean age 66.4 years). In all, 16 underwent radial artery graft (RAG) bypass and 16 underwent superficial temporal artery (STA) bypass. 4D flow MRI, time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were performed. Bypass patency, flow direction, and blood flow volume (BFV) of each artery were determined by 4D flow MRI. Arterial diameters were measured by TOF-MRA and CTA. We compared RAG and STA bypasses by evaluating the flow direction and BFV of each artery. We evaluated the correlation between arterial diameters (measured by CTA or MRA) and the BFV and the detectability of flow direction (measured by 4D flow MRI) of each artery. RESULTS: 4D flow MRI confirmed the patency of each bypass artery. Flow direction of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and BFV in the bypass artery differed between RAG and STA groups (p < 0.01). BFV in the bypass slightly correlated with the diameters on CTA (p < 0.05, R (2) = 0.287). Of the 29 arteries in the circle of Willis, nine were not depicted on 4D flow MRI. Cutoff values for arterial diameters on CTA and TOF-MRA for detecting the artery on 4D flow MRI were 2.4 and 1.8 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: 4D flow MRI provided unique information for characterizing EC-IC bypasses, although this detectability is limited when addressing small arteries with slow flow.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to assess the feasibility of using time-resolved 3D phase-contrast (4D flow) MRI to characterize extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass. METHODS: We enrolled 32 patients who underwent EC-IC bypass (15 men, 17 women; mean age 66.4 years). In all, 16 underwent radial artery graft (RAG) bypass and 16 underwent superficial temporal artery (STA) bypass. 4D flow MRI, time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were performed. Bypass patency, flow direction, and blood flow volume (BFV) of each artery were determined by 4D flow MRI. Arterial diameters were measured by TOF-MRA and CTA. We compared RAG and STA bypasses by evaluating the flow direction and BFV of each artery. We evaluated the correlation between arterial diameters (measured by CTA or MRA) and the BFV and the detectability of flow direction (measured by 4D flow MRI) of each artery. RESULTS: 4D flow MRI confirmed the patency of each bypass artery. Flow direction of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and BFV in the bypass artery differed between RAG and STA groups (p < 0.01). BFV in the bypass slightly correlated with the diameters on CTA (p < 0.05, R (2) = 0.287). Of the 29 arteries in the circle of Willis, nine were not depicted on 4D flow MRI. Cutoff values for arterial diameters on CTA and TOF-MRA for detecting the artery on 4D flow MRI were 2.4 and 1.8 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: 4D flow MRI provided unique information for characterizing EC-IC bypasses, although this detectability is limited when addressing small arteries with slow flow.
Authors: P van Ooij; J J M Zwanenburg; F Visser; C B Majoie; E vanBavel; J Hendrikse; A J Nederveen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jelena Bock; Alex Frydrychowicz; Aurélien F Stalder; Thorsten A Bley; Hans Burkhardt; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.668