OBJECTIVE: To investigate and characterize the association between fluoroscopy radiation dose rate and various patient size metrics during ureteroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluoroscopy data were collected from 100 patients undergoing ureteroscopy for stone disease. Radiation dose rates were determined from fluoroscopy dose and time. Estimated entrance skin dose was calculated from air kerma (AK) by applying correction factors. Effective dose (ED) was estimated with Monte Carlo-based simulation software. Patient size metrics included body mass index (BMI), anterior-posterior (AP) midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and region of interest (ROI) pixel value magnitude on computed tomography scout. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the association between AK dose rate and patient size metrics, adjusting for laterality and stone location. RESULTS: Obese patients (>30 kg/m(2)) comprised 46% of the cohort. Mean fluoroscopy time, displayed AK, entrance skin dose, and ED were 4.2 ± 6.0 second, 1.2 ± 2.1 mGy, 1.2 ± 2.2 mGy, and 0.08 ± 0.15 mSv, respectively. Mean AK dose rate and ED dose rates were 0.30 ± 0.23 mGy/second and 0.021 ± 0.016 mSv/second, respectively. Compared with the nonobese category, the highest BMI category (≥35 kg/m(2)) had over a 3-fold higher mean AK rate (0.50 vs 0.16 mGy/second). On univariate and multivariate analysis, BMI, AP midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and computed tomography scout region of interest pixel value magnitude were each significantly associated with dose rate. CONCLUSION: Larger patients experience higher radiation dose rates under fluoroscopy. Severely obese patients receive 3-fold higher dose rates compared with nonobese patients. Given the higher incidence of stone disease in obese patients, all attempts should be made to minimize radiation exposure during ureteroscopy.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and characterize the association between fluoroscopy radiation dose rate and various patient size metrics during ureteroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluoroscopy data were collected from 100 patients undergoing ureteroscopy for stone disease. Radiation dose rates were determined from fluoroscopy dose and time. Estimated entrance skin dose was calculated from air kerma (AK) by applying correction factors. Effective dose (ED) was estimated with Monte Carlo-based simulation software. Patient size metrics included body mass index (BMI), anterior-posterior (AP) midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and region of interest (ROI) pixel value magnitude on computed tomography scout. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the association between AK dose rate and patient size metrics, adjusting for laterality and stone location. RESULTS:Obesepatients (>30 kg/m(2)) comprised 46% of the cohort. Mean fluoroscopy time, displayed AK, entrance skin dose, and ED were 4.2 ± 6.0 second, 1.2 ± 2.1 mGy, 1.2 ± 2.2 mGy, and 0.08 ± 0.15 mSv, respectively. Mean AK dose rate and ED dose rates were 0.30 ± 0.23 mGy/second and 0.021 ± 0.016 mSv/second, respectively. Compared with the nonobese category, the highest BMI category (≥35 kg/m(2)) had over a 3-fold higher mean AK rate (0.50 vs 0.16 mGy/second). On univariate and multivariate analysis, BMI, AP midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and computed tomography scout region of interest pixel value magnitude were each significantly associated with dose rate. CONCLUSION: Larger patients experience higher radiation dose rates under fluoroscopy. Severely obesepatients receive 3-fold higher dose rates compared with nonobese patients. Given the higher incidence of stone disease in obesepatients, all attempts should be made to minimize radiation exposure during ureteroscopy.
Authors: Michael E Lipkin; Agnes J Wang; Greta Toncheva; Michael N Ferrandino; Terry T Yoshizumi; Glenn M Preminger Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Paul J Kokorowski; Jeanne S Chow; Keith Strauss; Melanie Pennison; Jonathan C Routh; Caleb P Nelson Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael N Ferrandino; Aditya Bagrodia; Sean A Pierre; Charles D Scales; Edward Rampersaud; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Agnes J Wang; Zachariah G Goldsmith; Chu Wang; Giao Nguyen; Gastón M Astroza; Andreas Neisius; Muhammad W Iqbal; Amy M Neville; Carolyn Lowry; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Glenn M Preminger; Michael N Ferrandino; Michael E Lipkin Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Laura E Ewing; Isabelle R Miousse; Rupak Pathak; Charles M Skinner; Stanley Kosanke; Marjan Boerma; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Igor Koturbash Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Simon Hein; Konrad Wilhelm; Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Christian Gratzke; Johannes Salem; Leonidas Karapanos; Christopher Netsch; Benedikt Becker; Armin Secker; Julian Veser; Andreas Neisius; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Marco Julius Schnabel Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-03-21 Impact factor: 4.226