Literature DB >> 23958504

Severe obesity is associated with 3-fold higher radiation dose rate during ureteroscopy.

Ryan S Hsi1, David A Zamora, Kalpana M Kanal, Jonathan D Harper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and characterize the association between fluoroscopy radiation dose rate and various patient size metrics during ureteroscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluoroscopy data were collected from 100 patients undergoing ureteroscopy for stone disease. Radiation dose rates were determined from fluoroscopy dose and time. Estimated entrance skin dose was calculated from air kerma (AK) by applying correction factors. Effective dose (ED) was estimated with Monte Carlo-based simulation software. Patient size metrics included body mass index (BMI), anterior-posterior (AP) midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and region of interest (ROI) pixel value magnitude on computed tomography scout. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the association between AK dose rate and patient size metrics, adjusting for laterality and stone location.
RESULTS: Obese patients (>30 kg/m(2)) comprised 46% of the cohort. Mean fluoroscopy time, displayed AK, entrance skin dose, and ED were 4.2 ± 6.0 second, 1.2 ± 2.1 mGy, 1.2 ± 2.2 mGy, and 0.08 ± 0.15 mSv, respectively. Mean AK dose rate and ED dose rates were 0.30 ± 0.23 mGy/second and 0.021 ± 0.016 mSv/second, respectively. Compared with the nonobese category, the highest BMI category (≥35 kg/m(2)) had over a 3-fold higher mean AK rate (0.50 vs 0.16 mGy/second). On univariate and multivariate analysis, BMI, AP midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and computed tomography scout region of interest pixel value magnitude were each significantly associated with dose rate.
CONCLUSION: Larger patients experience higher radiation dose rates under fluoroscopy. Severely obese patients receive 3-fold higher dose rates compared with nonobese patients. Given the higher incidence of stone disease in obese patients, all attempts should be made to minimize radiation exposure during ureteroscopy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23958504      PMCID: PMC4843513          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  22 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  Determination of patient radiation dose during ureteroscopic treatment of urolithiasis using a validated model.

Authors:  Michael E Lipkin; Agnes J Wang; Greta Toncheva; Michael N Ferrandino; Terry T Yoshizumi; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Fluoroscopic organ and tissue-specific radiation exposure by sex and body mass index during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Nathaniel Krupp; Ryan Bowman; Christopher Tenggardjaja; Forrest Jellison; Bryan Hill; Kamyar Ebrahimi; Jason Smith; Donald Farley; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Prospective measurement of patient exposure to radiation during pediatric ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Paul J Kokorowski; Jeanne S Chow; Keith Strauss; Melanie Pennison; Jonathan C Routh; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones.

Authors:  Eric N Taylor; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers.

Authors:  Michael N Ferrandino; Aditya Bagrodia; Sean A Pierre; Charles D Scales; Edward Rampersaud; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures.

Authors:  E Kuon; C Glaser; J B Dahm
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Obesity triples the radiation dose of stone protocol computerized tomography.

Authors:  Agnes J Wang; Zachariah G Goldsmith; Chu Wang; Giao Nguyen; Gastón M Astroza; Andreas Neisius; Muhammad W Iqbal; Amy M Neville; Carolyn Lowry; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Glenn M Preminger; Michael N Ferrandino; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing care for the obese patient in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Dwight Aberle; Hearns Charles; Steven Hodak; Daniel O'Neill; Rahmi Oklu; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Obesity and Kidney Stone Procedures.

Authors:  Nikhi P Singh; Carter J Boyd; William Poore; Kyle Wood; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2020

3.  NZO/HlLtJ as a novel model for the studies on the role of metabolic syndrome in acute radiation toxicity.

Authors:  Laura E Ewing; Isabelle R Miousse; Rupak Pathak; Charles M Skinner; Stanley Kosanke; Marjan Boerma; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Surgical experience gained during an endourology fellowship program may affect fluoroscopy time during ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Amitay Lorber; Ofer N Gofrit; Vladimir Yutkin; Ezekiel H Landau; Dov Pode; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Examining the association of body mass index and the depth of epidural space, radiation dose exposure and fluoroscopic screening time during transforaminal nerve block injection: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Adam S Galbraith; Emma Wallace; Aiden Devitt
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy versus retrograde ureteroscopy: is radiation exposure a criterion when we choose which modern treatment to apply for ureteric stones?

Authors:  Catalin Pricop; Adrian Maier; Dragos Negru; Ovidiu Malau; Martha Orsolya; Daniel Radavoi; Dragomir R Serban
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.363

7.  Reducing the rate of negative ureteroscopy: predictive factors and the role of preoperative imaging.

Authors:  A C Brodie; T J Johnston; P Lloyd; L Hemsworth; M Barabas; S R Keoghane
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.951

8.  Ultrasound Guidance to Assist Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Reduces Radiation Exposure in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; Selma Masic; Helena C Chang; Isabel E Allen; Thomas Chi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Konrad Wilhelm; Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Christian Gratzke; Johannes Salem; Leonidas Karapanos; Christopher Netsch; Benedikt Becker; Armin Secker; Julian Veser; Andreas Neisius; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Marco Julius Schnabel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 4.226

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.