Literature DB >> 32200411

Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation.

Simon Hein1, Konrad Wilhelm2, Arkadiusz Miernik2, Martin Schoenthaler2, Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola2, Christian Gratzke2, Johannes Salem3, Leonidas Karapanos3, Christopher Netsch4, Benedikt Becker4, Armin Secker5, Julian Veser6, Andreas Neisius7, Hans-Martin Fritsche8, Marco Julius Schnabel9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may require extensive X-ray usage. We evaluated the impact of preoperative surgeon briefing regarding the inclusion and evaluation of fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) in a multicenter study on the applied X-ray usage.
METHODS: A prospective multicenter study of 6 tertiary centers was performed. Each center recruited up to 25 prospective patients with renal stones of any size for RIRS. Prior to study´s onset, all surgeons were briefed about hazards of radiation and on strategies to avoid high doses in RIRS. Prospective procedures were compared to past procedures, as baseline data. FT was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary parameters were stone-free rate (SFR), complications according to the Clavien, SATAVA and postureteroscopic lesion scale. Results were analyzed using T test, chi-squared test, univariate analysis and confirmed in a multivariate regression model.
RESULTS: 303 patients were included (145 retro- and 158 prospective). Mean FT and DAP were reduced from 130.8 s/565.8 to 77.4 s/357.8 (p < 0.05). SFR was improved from 85.5% to 93% (p < 0.05). Complications did not vary significantly. Neither stone position (p = 0.569), prestenting (p = 0.419), nor surgeons' experience (> 100 RIRS) had a significant impact on FT. Significant univariate parameters were confirmed in a multivariate model, revealing X-ray training to be radiation protective (OR - 44, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased surgeon awareness of X-ray exposure risks has a significant impact on FT and DAP. This "awareness effect" is a simple method to reduce radiation exposure for the patient and OR staff without the procedures´ outcome and safety being affected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexible ureteroscopy; Fluoroscopy; Ionizing radiation exposure; Nephrolithiasis; Urolithiasis; X-ray exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32200411      PMCID: PMC7858553          DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03160-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  16 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy time during uncomplicated unilateral ureteroscopy for urolithiasis decreases with urology resident experience.

Authors:  Lancaster R Weld; Uzoamaka O Nwoye; Richard B Knight; Timothy S Baumgartner; James S Ebertowski; Matthew T Stringer; Matthew C Kasprenski; Kyle J Weld
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Ultralow Radiation Exposure During Flexible Ureteroscopy in Patients With Nephrolithiasis-How Far Can We Go?

Authors:  Simon Hein; Martin Schoenthaler; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; Werner Vach; Ulrich Wetterauer; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Determination of patient radiation dose during ureteroscopic treatment of urolithiasis using a validated model.

Authors:  Michael E Lipkin; Agnes J Wang; Greta Toncheva; Michael N Ferrandino; Terry T Yoshizumi; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Safety, minimization, and awareness radiation training reduces fluoroscopy time during unilateral ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Lancaster R Weld; Uzoamaka O Nwoye; Richard B Knight; Timothy S Baumgartner; James S Ebertowski; Matthew T Stringer; Matthew C Kasprenski; Kyle J Weld
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Radiation Exposure during the Evaluation and Management of Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Tony T Chen; Chu Wang; Michael N Ferrandino; Charles D Scales; Terry T Yoshizumi; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Comparison of a reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol to conventional fluoroscopy during uncomplicated ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Daniel J Greene; Christopher F Tenggadjaja; Ryan J Bowman; Gautum Agarwal; Kamyar Y Ebrahimi; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Dedan Opondo; Francisco P J Daels; Guido Giusti; Alvaro Serrano; Sangam V Kandasami; J Stuart Wolf; Magnus Grabe; Stavros Gravas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Influence of surgeon's experience on fluoroscopy time during endourological interventions.

Authors:  M Ritter; F Siegel; P Krombach; A Martinschek; C Weiss; A Häcker; A E Pelzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Contemporary surgical trends in the management of upper tract calculi.

Authors:  Daniel T Oberlin; Andrew S Flum; Laurie Bachrach; Richard S Matulewicz; Sarah C Flury
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Rob McCarney; James Warner; Steve Iliffe; Robbert van Haselen; Mark Griffin; Peter Fisher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  ALARA in Urology: Steps to Minimise Radiation Exposure During All Parts of the Endourological Journey.

Authors:  Radhika Bhanot; Zeeshan B M Hameed; Milap Shah; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Andreas Skolarikos; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.