Literature DB >> 25894628

Surgical experience gained during an endourology fellowship program may affect fluoroscopy time during ureterorenoscopy.

Stavros Sfoungaristos1, Amitay Lorber, Ofer N Gofrit, Vladimir Yutkin, Ezekiel H Landau, Dov Pode, Mordechai Duvdevani.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify parameters that affect fluoroscopy time during ureteroscopy or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and to evaluate the potential role of surgical experience gained during a fellowship program in decreasing radiation exposure. A database of patients who underwent ureteroscopy or RIRS was evaluated. Procedures were performed either by an experienced Endourologist (surgeon A) or by an Endourology fellow. Operations performed by the fellow were further divided to them performed during fellow's 1st year of training (surgeon F1) and 2nd year of training (surgeon F2). The association between fluoroscopy time and several factors was evaluated. Eighteen (19.6%) procedures were performed by surgeon F1, 13 (14.1%) by surgeon F2 and 61 (66.3%) cases were performed by surgeon A. Fluoroscopy time was significantly higher in cases performed by surgeon F1 compared to surgeon F2 (p=0.025) and A (p=0.001). However, there was no difference between surgeon F2 and A (p=0.969). There was significant association between fluoroscopy time and obesity (p=0.023), stone size (p=0.009), surgical experience (p=0.001), procedure duration (p<0.001) and the insertion of a postoperative double-J stent (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that procedure duration (p=0.003), postoperative stenting (p=0.009) and surgeon's experience (p<0.001) were all significant independent predictors of increased fluoroscopy time. Fluoroscopy time may widely vary during ureteroscopy and RIRS. Procedure duration, the insertion of a postoperative double-J stent and surgical experience are all independent predictors of increased fluoroscopy time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25894628     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0774-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  12 in total

1.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog.

Authors:  Fred A Mettler; Walter Huda; Terry T Yoshizumi; Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context.

Authors:  F A Stewart; A V Akleyev; M Hauer-Jensen; J H Hendry; N J Kleiman; T J Macvittie; B M Aleman; A B Edgar; K Mabuchi; C R Muirhead; R E Shore; W H Wallace
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2012-02

4.  Determination of patient radiation dose during ureteroscopic treatment of urolithiasis using a validated model.

Authors:  Michael E Lipkin; Agnes J Wang; Greta Toncheva; Michael N Ferrandino; Terry T Yoshizumi; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Variations among urology trainees in their use of fluoroscopy during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Safety, minimization, and awareness radiation training reduces fluoroscopy time during unilateral ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Lancaster R Weld; Uzoamaka O Nwoye; Richard B Knight; Timothy S Baumgartner; James S Ebertowski; Matthew T Stringer; Matthew C Kasprenski; Kyle J Weld
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Fluoroscopic organ and tissue-specific radiation exposure by sex and body mass index during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Nathaniel Krupp; Ryan Bowman; Christopher Tenggardjaja; Forrest Jellison; Bryan Hill; Kamyar Ebrahimi; Jason Smith; Donald Farley; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  [Patient radiation exposure during ureteroscopic stone extraction].

Authors:  G Zöller; P Virsik-Köpp; C Vowinkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureteropyeloscopy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert R Byrne; Brian K Auge; John Kourambas; Ravi Munver; Fernando Delvecchio; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open.

Authors:  Rocco Damiano; Riccardo Autorino; Ciro Esposito; Francesco Cantiello; Rosario Sacco; Marco de Sio; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fluoroless ureteroscopy: in whom and when?

Authors:  Ramazan Kocaaslan; Adem Tok; Senad Kalkan; Ali İhsan Tasci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Thomas Knoll; Guido Kamphuis; Kemal Sarica; C Seitz; E Liatsikos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Xiaolin Huang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy?

Authors:  Michaël M E L Henderickx; Tim Brits; Natalia S Zabegalina; Joyce Baard; Mansour Ballout; Harrie P Beerlage; Stefan De Wachter; Guido M Kamphuis
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2022-01-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.