Literature DB >> 22341275

Prospective measurement of patient exposure to radiation during pediatric ureteroscopy.

Paul J Kokorowski1, Jeanne S Chow, Keith Strauss, Melanie Pennison, Jonathan C Routh, Caleb P Nelson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few data have been reported regarding radiation exposure during pediatric endourological procedures, including ureteroscopy. We measured radiation exposure during pediatric ureteroscopy and identify opportunities for exposure reduction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively observed ureteroscopy procedures as part of a quality improvement initiative. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative factors, fluoroscopy settings and radiation exposure were recorded. Our outcomes were entrance skin dose and midline dose (both mGy). Specific modifiable factors were identified as targets for potential quality improvement.
RESULTS: Direct observation was performed in 54 consecutive ureteroscopy procedures. Mean±SD patient age was 14.8±3.8 years (range 7.4 to 19.2), with 9 children being younger than 12 years. Mean±SD entrance skin dose was 46.4±48 mGy. Mean±SD midline dose was 6.2±5.0 mGy. The most important major determinant of radiation dose was total fluoroscopy time (mean±SD 2.68±1.8 minutes) followed by dose rate setting, child anteroposterior diameter and source to skin distance (all p<0.01). Analysis of factors affecting exposure levels revealed that use of ureteral access sheaths (p=0.01) and retrograde pyelography (p=0.04) were significantly associated with fluoroscopy time. We also found that dose rate settings were higher than recommended in up to 43% of cases and ideal C-arm positioning could have reduced exposure by 14% (up to 49% in some cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Children receive biologically significant radiation doses during ureteroscopy procedures. Several modifiable factors contribute to dose and could be targeted in efforts to implement dose reduction strategies. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22341275      PMCID: PMC3810162          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

1.  The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality?

Authors:  Thomas L Slovis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radiation exposure during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  D H Bagley; A Cubler-Goodman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Trends in imaging and surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis at American pediatric hospitals.

Authors:  Jonathan C Routh; Dionne A Graham; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Hawthorne effect: shortening of fluoroscopy times during radiation measurement studies.

Authors:  T Vehmas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

8.  Pediatric flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: the children's hospital of Philadelphia experience.

Authors:  Steve S Kim; Thomas F Kolon; Daniel Canter; Michael White; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Harry Cullings; Akihiko Suyama; Sachiyo Funamoto; Nobuo Nishi; Midori Soda; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Kazunori Kodama; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Roy E Shore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: a single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome.

Authors:  Kristy VanDervoort; Jonathan Wiesen; Rachel Frank; Suzanne Vento; Virginia Crosby; Manju Chandra; Howard Trachtman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Ureteroscopy for treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children: technical considerations.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; Joan Ko; Brian R Matlaga; Ming-Hsien Wang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Use of and regional variation in initial CT imaging for kidney stones.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Jose E Pulido; Ron Keren; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Jan M Hanley; Rodger Madison; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones: is fluoroscopy-free technique achievable?

Authors:  Yonghan Peng; Bin Xu; Wei Zhang; Ling Li; Min Liu; Xiaofeng Gao; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Severe obesity is associated with 3-fold higher radiation dose rate during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; David A Zamora; Kalpana M Kanal; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Use of Ultrasound in Pediatric Renal Stone Diagnosis and Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Morrison; Trudy Kawal; Jason P Van Batavia; Arun K Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Prospective systematic intervention to reduce patient exposure to radiation during pediatric ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Paul J Kokorowski; Jeanne S Chow; Keith J Strauss; Melanie Pennison; William Tan; Bartley Cilento; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Effective and organ specific radiation doses from videourodynamics in children.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Jean Dearn; Melanie Dean; David A Zamora; Kalpana M Kanal; Jonathan D Harper; Paul A Merguerian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.