BACKGROUND: The last nationally representative assessment of kidney stone prevalence in the United States occurred in 1994. After a 13-yr hiatus, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) reinitiated data collection regarding kidney stone history. OBJECTIVE: Describe the current prevalence of stone disease in the United States, and identify factors associated with a history of kidney stones. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis of responses to the 2007-2010 NHANES (n=12 110). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Self-reported history of kidney stones. Percent prevalence was calculated and multivariable models were used to identify factors associated with a history of kidney stones. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The prevalence of kidney stones was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1-9.5). Among men, the prevalence of stones was 10.6% (95% CI, 9.4-11.9), compared with 7.1% (95% CI, 6.4-7.8) among women. Kidney stones were more common among obese than normal-weight individuals (11.2% [95% CI, 10.0-12.3] compared with 6.1% [95% CI, 4.8-7.4], respectively; p<0.001). Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic individuals were less likely to report a history of stone disease than were white, non-Hispanic individuals (black, non-Hispanic: odds ratio [OR]: 0.37 [95% CI, 0.28-0.49], p<0.001; Hispanic: OR: 0.60 [95% CI, 0.49-0.73], p<0.001). Obesity and diabetes were strongly associated with a history of kidney stones in multivariable models. The cross-sectional survey design limits causal inference regarding potential risk factors for kidney stones. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney stones affect approximately 1 in 11 people in the United States. These data represent a marked increase in stone disease compared with the NHANES III cohort, particularly in black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic individuals. Diet and lifestyle factors likely play an important role in the changing epidemiology of kidney stones. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: The last nationally representative assessment of kidney stone prevalence in the United States occurred in 1994. After a 13-yr hiatus, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) reinitiated data collection regarding kidney stone history. OBJECTIVE: Describe the current prevalence of stone disease in the United States, and identify factors associated with a history of kidney stones. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis of responses to the 2007-2010 NHANES (n=12 110). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Self-reported history of kidney stones. Percent prevalence was calculated and multivariable models were used to identify factors associated with a history of kidney stones. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The prevalence of kidney stones was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1-9.5). Among men, the prevalence of stones was 10.6% (95% CI, 9.4-11.9), compared with 7.1% (95% CI, 6.4-7.8) among women. Kidney stones were more common among obese than normal-weight individuals (11.2% [95% CI, 10.0-12.3] compared with 6.1% [95% CI, 4.8-7.4], respectively; p<0.001). Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic individuals were less likely to report a history of stone disease than were white, non-Hispanic individuals (black, non-Hispanic: odds ratio [OR]: 0.37 [95% CI, 0.28-0.49], p<0.001; Hispanic: OR: 0.60 [95% CI, 0.49-0.73], p<0.001). Obesity and diabetes were strongly associated with a history of kidney stones in multivariable models. The cross-sectional survey design limits causal inference regarding potential risk factors for kidney stones. CONCLUSIONS:Kidney stones affect approximately 1 in 11 people in the United States. These data represent a marked increase in stone disease compared with the NHANES III cohort, particularly in black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic individuals. Diet and lifestyle factors likely play an important role in the changing epidemiology of kidney stones. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Kiriaki K Stamatelou; Mildred E Francis; Camille A Jones; Leroy M Nyberg; Gary C Curhan Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Naim M Maalouf; Khashayar Sakhaee; Joan H Parks; Frederic L Coe; Beverley Adams-Huet; Charles Y C Pak Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Howard A Fink; Joseph W Akornor; Pranav S Garimella; Rod MacDonald; Andrea Cutting; Indulis R Rutks; Manoj Monga; Timothy J Wilt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Angelito A Silverio; Wen-Yaw Chung; Cheanyeh Cheng; Hai-Lung Wang; Chien-Min Kung; Jun Chen; Vincent F S Tsai Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Connor Houghton; Pooja M Patel; Leanora W Merwin; Kye P Poronsky; Anna L Caroll; Carol Sánchez Santana; Maggie Breslin; Charles D Scales; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor; Erik P Hess Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-02-16 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Gregory E Tasian; Michelle Ross; Lihai Song; Janet Audrain-McGovern; Douglas Wiebe; Steven G Warner; Brittney Henderson; Anisha Patel; Susan L Furth Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 7.450