Literature DB >> 12814927

Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures.

E Kuon1, C Glaser, J B Dahm.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to improve radiation dose reduction techniques in invasive cardiology and after patients' radiation data had approached minimal levels, to evaluate predictors of their radiation exposure resulting from invasive cardiac procedures. Over the course of 1 year (and 1996 procedures) we minimized cinegraphic frames and runs, as well as fluoroscopy time, and trained ourselves to achieve effective fluoroscopy-saving positioning of blinds and filters toward the regions of interest. We were consequently able to reduce the mean dose-area products (DAP) for coronary angiography and angioplasty, combined interventions, high-frequency rotational atherectomy, and excimer laser angioplasty: from levels of 53.9 Gy cm(2), 79.6 Gy cm(2), 112.3 Gy cm(2), 119.4 Gy cm(2), and 168.0 Gy cm(2) as currently reported in the literature, to 12.9 Gy cm(2), 13.3 Gy cm(2), 25.9 Gy cm(2), 33.0 Gy cm(2), and 27.1 Gy cm(2), respectively. The mean DAP due to interventions in acute myocardial infarction was 38.3 Gy cm(2). DAP was influenced by body mass index, complexity of coronary artery disease, tube angulation, documented structure, coronary recanalization, emergency circumstances, and the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) target vessel involved, but not by stent implantation. By favouring radiation-reducing cranial posteroanterior views over standard left anterior oblique views for visualization of the left anterior descending and the diagonal artery, we consequently achieved mean PTCA-DAPs of 10.4 Gy cm(2) and 8.6 Gy cm(2), respectively: levels significantly lower than those for PTCA of the right coronary artery (13.3 Gy cm(2)), left circumflex artery (13.7 Gy cm(2)), and obtuse marginal branch (16.9 Gy cm(2)). In conclusion, enhanced knowledge of radiation dose-reduction techniques significantly reduces patient radiation hazards in invasive cardiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814927     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/82051842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of coronary angiographic projections to balance the clinical yield with the radiation risk.

Authors:  I R Smith; J Cameron; K L Mengersen; J T Rivers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  N Journy; S Sinno-Tellier; C Maccia; A Le Tertre; P Pirard; P Pagès; D Eilstein; J Donadieu; O Bar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.

Authors:  Andrew G Davies; Arnold R Cowen; Stephen M Kengyelics; Janet Moore; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.

Authors:  J Partridge; G McGahan; S Causton; M Bowers; M Mason; M Dalby; A Mitchell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Efficiency of a minicourse in radiation reducing techniques: a pilot initiative to encourage less irradiating cardiological interventional techniques (ELICIT).

Authors:  E Kuon; K Empen; D M Robinson; A Pfahlberg; O Gefeller; J B Dahm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  V Sadick; W Reed; L Collins; N Sadick; R Heard; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.

Authors:  E Kuon; J B Dahm; D M Robinson; K Empen; M Günther; W Wucherer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-10

8.  Impact of StentBoost subtract imaging on patient radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhigeng Jin; Shengli Yang; Limin Jing; Huiliang Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Patients' radiation dose during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies according to underlying characteristics.

Authors:  Hong Min Kim; Kyoung Hyo Choi; Tae Woo Kim
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantos; Georgios Patatoukas; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.