Literature DB >> 23807125

Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Seok In Seo1, Chang Sik Yu, Gwon Sik Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to identify the risk factors and patient characteristics associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.
METHOD: Between 2000 and 2007, 2,362 patients underwent sphincter-saving surgery [low anterior resection or ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR)] for rectal cancer. These patients were divided into two groups: 71 patients with permanent stomas and 2,291 patients without permanent stomas after rectal cancer surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 71 permanent stomas (3 % of the patients), 34 (48 %) were ileostomies, 11 (15 %) were loop colostomies, 10 (14 %) were treated by Hartmann's operation, and 16 (23 %) were treated by abdominoperineal resection. Diverting stomas were created in 364 patients; 3 % (n = 11) of them could not be reversed due to anastomosis-related complications. Permanent stomas were constructed at a median of 20 months after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. The main causes of permanent stomas were local recurrence (n = 27), anastomotic leakage (n = 12), fistula (n = 9), and anastomosis site stricture (n = 7). The main causes of early permanent stomas (<1 year) were anastomosis-related complications, whereas for late permanent stomas (≥1 year), the main cause was local cancer recurrence. The independent risk factors for permanent stomas were local recurrence, postoperative pelvic sepsis, male gender of the patient, the uLAR operation type, and perioperative radiation therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume surgical center, sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer is associated with a low incidence of permanent stoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807125     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2145-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  31 in total

1.  Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; C A Marijnen; I D Nagtegaal; H Putter; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; L Pahlman; B Glimelius; J H van Krieken; J W Leer; C J van de Velde
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996.

Authors:  M Kairaluoma; H Rissanen; V Kultti; J-P Mecklin; I Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Rickard Lindgren; Olof Hallböök; Jörgen Rutegård; Rune Sjödahl; Peter Matthiessen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K C M J Peeters; R A E M Tollenaar; C A M Marijnen; E Klein Kranenbarg; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with colonic pouch for rectal cancer: a comparison between two hospitals with a different policy.

Authors:  Mikael Machado; Olof Hallböök; Sven Goldman; Per-Olof Nyström; Johannes Järhult; Rune Sjödahl
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary?

Authors:  G G David; J P Slavin; S Willmott; D J Corless; A U Khan; C R Selvasekar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  The incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection.

Authors:  C M H Bailey; J M D Wheeler; M Birks; R Farouk
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  The outcome following sphincter-saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Williams; P Durdey; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics.

Authors:  F Cavaliere; J H Pemberton; M Cosimelli; V W Fazio; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Is there an Advantage to a Minimally Invasive Approach?

Authors:  Monica T Young; Grace S Hwang; Gopal Menon; Timothy F Feldmann; Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Eden Perez; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancers: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Stoma.

Authors:  Joanna Chung Kiu Mak; Dominic Chi Chung Foo; Rockson Wei; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Sun; Xianbo Yu; Haijiang Wang; Ming Ma; Zeliang Zhao; Qisan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ri Na Yoo; Gun Kim; Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyeon-Min Cho; HyungJin Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.

Authors:  Minna Räsänen; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Monika Carpelan-Holmström; Anna Lepistö
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With the Nonreversal Ileostomy Following Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Young Ah Kim; Gil Jae Lee; Sung Won Park; Won-Suk Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Revised risk factors and patient characteristics for failure to close a defunctioning ileostomy following low anterior resection for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Barenboim; Ravit Geva; Hagit Tulchinsky
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Preoperative risk stratification of permanent stoma in patients with non-metastatic mid and low rectal cancer undergoing curative resection and a temporary stoma.

Authors:  Shu-Huan Huang; Kun-Yu Tsai; Tzong-Yun Tsai; Jeng-Fu You; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Reiping Tang; Jy-Ming Chiang; Wen-Sy Tsai
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Transanal drainage tube: alternative option to defunctioning stoma in rectal cancer surgery?

Authors:  Fabio Carboni; Mario Valle; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Manuel Giofrè; Orietta Federici; Settimio Zazza; Alfredo Garofalo
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-05

10.  Assessment by Using a Water-Soluble Contrast Enema Study of Radiologic Leakage in Lower Rectal Cancer Patients With Sphincter-Saving Surgery.

Authors:  Seok In Seo; Jong Lyul Lee; Seong Ho Park; Hyun Kwon Ha; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.