Literature DB >> 12814411

The incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection.

C M H Bailey1, J M D Wheeler, M Birks, R Farouk.   

Abstract

AIMS: Defunctioning stomas are used following anterior resection to guard against the serious consequences of anastomotic leak such as pelvic sepsis and generalized peritonitis. This study aims to determine what proportion of patients undergoing anterior resection have a defunctioning stoma, how many of these patients do not have their stoma closed, and the reasons for this.
METHODS: All patients undergoing a resection for rectal cancer in our institution in a five year period (January 1995 to December 1999) are included in the study. Anterior resection was performed on 154 patients, divided into 76 anterior resections (AR) and 78 low anterior resections (defined as the anastomosis within 6 cm of the anal verge). The data from these patients were analysed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Of the total of 154 patients undergoing anterior resection, 59 (38%) were defunctioned, divided into 33 with loop ileostomy and 26 with loop colostomy. Five of these patients had not had their stoma closed at a median follow up of four years (range 1.5-6.5 years). The reasons for non closure were anastomotic stricture (2), metastatic disease (2), and patient choice (1). When comparing AR and LAR, 16% of patients had a defunctioning stoma after AR, compared with 60% after LAR (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Anterior resection is being performed for very low rectal tumours in order to avoid a permanent stoma. However we have found that 8% of patients who are defunctioned with a stoma at anterior resection will not have their stoma closed, and conclude that patients should be warned of this pre-operatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814411     DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.4.s1.1_78.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  26 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong Zhi Geng; Dilidan Nasier; Bing Liu; Hua Gao; Yi Ke Xu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Is sphincter preservation reasonable in all patients with rectal cancer?

Authors:  Angela Fischer; Ignazio Tarantino; René Warschkow; Jochen Lange; Andreas Zerz; Franc H Hetzer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seok In Seo; Chang Sik Yu; Gwon Sik Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancers: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Stoma.

Authors:  Joanna Chung Kiu Mak; Dominic Chi Chung Foo; Rockson Wei; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review.

Authors:  Annelien N Morks; Klaas Havenga; Rutger J Ploeg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer with 30 Gy/10 f/2 w preoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Jin Gu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Do older Americans undergo stoma reversal following low anterior resection for rectal cancer?

Authors:  Christopher M Dodgion; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Yue-Yung Hu; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth Breen; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ri Na Yoo; Gun Kim; Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyeon-Min Cho; HyungJin Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction.

Authors:  Panagiotis Taflampas; Manousos Christodoulakis; Dimitrios D Tsiftsis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Low or Ultralow Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer Without Diverting Stoma: Experience with 28 Patients.

Authors:  E Soltani; A Jangjoo; E Saremi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.