Minna Räsänen1,2, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo3,4, Monika Carpelan-Holmström5, Anna Lepistö6. 1. Colorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. minna.rasanen@hus.fi. 2. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. minna.rasanen@hus.fi. 3. Colorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. laura.renkonen-sinisalo@hus.fi. 4. Research Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. laura.renkonen-sinisalo@hus.fi. 5. Colorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. monika.carpelan-holmstrom@hus.fi. 6. Colorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. anna.lepisto@hus.fi.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The adoption of the total mesorectum excision technique and circular stapler devices has enabled the performance of ultralow colorectal anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery. However, rupture of the anastomosis still usually leads to a permanent stoma. The aim of this study was to analyze the cumulative failure rate and risk factors associated with reversal of colorectal or coloanal anastomosis after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer, using standardized surgical regimen with the routine use of covering stoma. Our secondary interest was the feasibilities of redo surgery after failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 579 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland during 2005-2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 273 consecutive patients treated with a low anterior resection with a protective stoma were included. RESULTS: In total, 23 out of 271 (8.5 %) of the colorectal/coloanal anastomoses were converted to a permanent stoma. In five patients (1.8 %), the covering stoma was not closed. The permanent stoma rate was thus 28 out of 271 (10.3 %). The risk factors associated with failure were the tumor distance from the anal verge (p = 0.03), coloanal anastomosis (p = 0.003), early anastomotic complication (p < 0.001), anastomotic fistula (p < 0.001), anal incontinence (p = 0.05), and local recurrence (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our standardized surgical regimen with a covering stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer resulted in a minor anastomosis failure rate and a low risk of permanent stoma.
PURPOSE: The adoption of the total mesorectum excision technique and circular stapler devices has enabled the performance of ultralow colorectal anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery. However, rupture of the anastomosis still usually leads to a permanent stoma. The aim of this study was to analyze the cumulative failure rate and risk factors associated with reversal of colorectal or coloanal anastomosis after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer, using standardized surgical regimen with the routine use of covering stoma. Our secondary interest was the feasibilities of redo surgery after failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 579 consecutive rectal cancerpatients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland during 2005-2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 273 consecutive patients treated with a low anterior resection with a protective stoma were included. RESULTS: In total, 23 out of 271 (8.5 %) of the colorectal/coloanal anastomoses were converted to a permanent stoma. In five patients (1.8 %), the covering stoma was not closed. The permanent stoma rate was thus 28 out of 271 (10.3 %). The risk factors associated with failure were the tumor distance from the anal verge (p = 0.03), coloanal anastomosis (p = 0.003), early anastomotic complication (p < 0.001), anastomotic fistula (p < 0.001), anal incontinence (p = 0.05), and local recurrence (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our standardized surgical regimen with a covering stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer resulted in a minor anastomosis failure rate and a low risk of permanent stoma.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anastomotic failure; Colorectal/coloanal anastomosis; Covering stoma; Rectal cancer
Authors: Sang Hun Jung; Chang Sik Yu; Pyong Wha Choi; Dae Dong Kim; In Ja Park; Hee Cheol Kim; Jin Cheon Kim Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2008-04-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Angela Fischer; Ignazio Tarantino; René Warschkow; Jochen Lange; Andreas Zerz; Franc H Hetzer Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: K Stergios; K Kontzoglou; V Pergialiotis; L M Korou; M Frountzas; O Lalude; N Nikiteas; D N Perrea Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 1.891