Literature DB >> 26111635

Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.

Minna Räsänen1,2, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo3,4, Monika Carpelan-Holmström5, Anna Lepistö6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The adoption of the total mesorectum excision technique and circular stapler devices has enabled the performance of ultralow colorectal anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery. However, rupture of the anastomosis still usually leads to a permanent stoma. The aim of this study was to analyze the cumulative failure rate and risk factors associated with reversal of colorectal or coloanal anastomosis after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer, using standardized surgical regimen with the routine use of covering stoma. Our secondary interest was the feasibilities of redo surgery after failure.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 579 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland during 2005-2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 273 consecutive patients treated with a low anterior resection with a protective stoma were included.
RESULTS: In total, 23 out of 271 (8.5 %) of the colorectal/coloanal anastomoses were converted to a permanent stoma. In five patients (1.8 %), the covering stoma was not closed. The permanent stoma rate was thus 28 out of 271 (10.3 %). The risk factors associated with failure were the tumor distance from the anal verge (p = 0.03), coloanal anastomosis (p = 0.003), early anastomotic complication (p < 0.001), anastomotic fistula (p < 0.001), anal incontinence (p = 0.05), and local recurrence (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our standardized surgical regimen with a covering stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer resulted in a minor anastomosis failure rate and a low risk of permanent stoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic failure; Colorectal/coloanal anastomosis; Covering stoma; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26111635     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2291-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  29 in total

1.  Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge.

Authors:  Jeremie H Lefevre; Frederic Bretagnol; Leon Maggiori; Marianne Ferron; Arnaud Alves; Yves Panis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sang Hun Jung; Chang Sik Yu; Pyong Wha Choi; Dae Dong Kim; In Ja Park; Hee Cheol Kim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Laurent Genser; Gilles Manceau; Mehdi Karoui; Sylvie Breton; Christophe Brevart; Géraldine Rousseau; Jean-Christophe Vaillant; Laurent Hannoun
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Is sphincter preservation reasonable in all patients with rectal cancer?

Authors:  Angela Fischer; Ignazio Tarantino; René Warschkow; Jochen Lange; Andreas Zerz; Franc H Hetzer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bogdan C Paun; Scott Cassie; Anthony R MacLean; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Rickard Lindgren; Olof Hallböök; Jörgen Rutegård; Rune Sjödahl; Peter Matthiessen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak?

Authors:  Benjamin D Shogan; Erica M Carlisle; John C Alverdy; Konstantin Umanskiy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Double stapling technique for low anterior resection.

Authors:  Z Cohen; E Myers; B Langer; B Taylor; R H Railton; C Jamieson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.

Authors:  Jin Cheon Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Joon Woo Bong; Ji Hyun Seo; Chan Wook Kim; Seong Ho Park; Jihoon Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The potential effect of biological sealants on colorectal anastomosis healing in experimental research involving severe diabetes.

Authors:  K Stergios; K Kontzoglou; V Pergialiotis; L M Korou; M Frountzas; O Lalude; N Nikiteas; D N Perrea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.