Literature DB >> 11961355

Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996.

M Kairaluoma1, H Rissanen, V Kultti, J-P Mecklin, I Kellokumpu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of patients to whom a temporary stoma was constructed in our institution.
METHOD: The outcome of patients operated on over an 8-year period was prospectively examined. Special attention was given to the influence of age on complications and closure of stomas.
RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1996, a total of 349 intestinal stomas were constructed in 342 patients. In 141 of these patients, the stoma could be considered as temporary. The 30-day mortality rate was 7%. The overall complication rate was 50%. Pure stoma-related complications were observed in 12% of the patients. The final closure rate of temporary stomas was 67%. The closure rate was significantly higher if the temporary stomas were of the double-barrel type. There was no significant difference in the closure rate between patients with benign and malignant diseases, but the rate decreased significantly in age groups over 70 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of stomas constructed are considered as temporary, but only two-thirds of temporary stomas are closed subsequently. Especially end stomas tend to become permanent in patients over 70 years of age, although the morbidity rates of stoma closure do not differ from those of younger patients. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11961355     DOI: 10.1159/000052005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  16 in total

1.  Renal impairment caused by temporary loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Nicole Beck-Kaltenbach; Katja Voigt; Bernhard Rumstadt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The effect of peri-stomal infiltration with bupivacaine/epinephrine on post-operative pain, nausea and ease of surgery in reversal of loop ileostomies.

Authors:  Kawan Shalli; C Watson; Lynn McCaffer; David Clough; Vimty Muir; Angus Macdonald
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Nino Gullà; Stefano Trastulli; Carlo Boselli; Roberto Cirocchi; Davide Cavaliere; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Umberto Morelli; Daniele Gentile; Emilio Eugeni; Daniela Caracappa; Chiara Listorti; Francesco Sciannameo; Giuseppe Noya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seok In Seo; Chang Sik Yu; Gwon Sik Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Facilitated early ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a case-matched study.

Authors:  S Memon; A G Heriot; C E Atkin; A C Lynch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Anterior resection of rectal cancer without bowel preparation and diverting stoma.

Authors:  Eline A Vlot; Clark J Zeebregts; Jos J G M Gerritsen; H Jan Mulder; Walter J B Mastboom; Joost M Klaase
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Factors related to anastomotic dehiscence and mortality after terminal stomal closure in the management of patients with severe secondary peritonitis.

Authors:  José L Martínez; Enrique Luque-de-León; Pablo Andrade
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Multiple large bowel resections: potential risk factor for anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Eleftheria Kalogera; Sean C Dowdy; Andrea Mariani; Amy L Weaver; Giovanni Aletti; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; William A Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.