Literature DB >> 10773140

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

W I Law1, K W Chu, J W Ho, C W Chan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with the technique of total mesorectal excision (TME).
METHODS: From September 1993 to November 1998, 196 patients with rectal cancer from 3 to 12 cm from the anal verge were treated with low anterior resection with TME. The data were entered in a prospective manner, and the factors that might affect anastomotic leakage were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean level of anastomosis was 3.6 cm from the anal verge (range 1 to 5 cm). The leakage rate was 10.2%. Female gender (P = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 14.3; odds ratio 4.3) and presence of a diversion stoma (P = 0.01; 95% CI 1.4 to 14.2; odds ratio 4.5) were independent significant factors for lower anastomotic leakage. The absence of a stoma was associated with significantly increased leakage in male (P = 0.001) but not in female (P = 0.51) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: With low anastomosis after low anterior resection with TME, diversion stoma construction should be performed routinely in men. In women, the need for diversion can be more selective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10773140     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00252-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  112 in total

1.  The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Pera; S Delgado; J C García-Valdecasas; M Pera; A Castells; J M Piqué; E Bombuy; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Superiority of laparoscopic rectal surgery: Towards a new era.

Authors:  Yosuke Fukunaga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-27

3.  Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Authors:  Art Hiranyakas; Assar Rather; Giovanna da Silva; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [Protective stoma after deep anterior rectal resection: pro].

Authors:  A Ulrich; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  The impact of heavy smoking on anastomotic leakage and stricture after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Rumi Shin; Heung-Kwon Oh; Ji Won Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Diverting stoma with anterior resection for rectal cancer: does it reduce overall anastomotic leakage and leaks requiring laparotomy?

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Ming Zhong; Lu Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

7.  The influence of fecal diversion and anastomotic leakage on survival after resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jen-Kou Lin; Te-Cheng Yueh; Shih-Ching Chang; Chun-Chi Lin; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Huann-Sheng Wang; Shung-Haur Yang; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Wei-Shone Chen; Tzu-Chen Lin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: are 75 % preventable?

Authors:  Hodjat Shekarriz; Janina Eigenwald; Bijan Shekarriz; Jyoti Upadhyay; Jasmin Shekarriz; Danny Zoubie; Thilo Wedel; Henning Wittenburg
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  [Anastomotic leakage in the gastrointestinal tract-repair and prognosis].

Authors:  M Stumpf; U Klinge; P R Mertens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  The application of a new stapling device for open surgery (Contour Curved Cutter Stapler) in the laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Y Ishii; H Hasegawa; H Nishibori; T Endo; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.