Literature DB >> 21160312

What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Rickard Lindgren1, Olof Hallböök, Jörgen Rutegård, Rune Sjödahl, Peter Matthiessen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the risk for permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer.
METHODS: In a nationwide multicenter trial 234 patients undergoing low anterior resection of the rectum were randomly assigned to a group with defunctioning stomas (n = 116) or a group with no defunctioning stomas (n = 118). The median age was 68 years, 45% of the patients were women, 79% had preoperative radiotherapy, and 4% had International Union Against Cancer cancer stage IV. The patients were analyzed with regard to the presence of a permanent stoma, the type of stoma, the time point at which the stoma was constructed or considered as permanent, and the reasons for obtaining a permanent stoma. Median follow-up was 72 months (42-108). One patient with a defunctioning stoma who died within 30 days after the rectal resection was excluded from the analysis.
RESULTS: During the study period 19% (45/233) of the patients obtained a permanent stoma: 25 received an end sigmoid stoma and 20 received a loop ileostomy. The end sigmoid stomas were constructed at a median of 22 months (1-71) after the low anterior resection of the rectum, and the loop ileostomies were considered as permanent at a median of 12.5 months (1-47) after the initial rectal resection. The reasons for loop ileostomy were metastatic disease (n = 6), unsatisfactory anorectal function (n = 6), deteriorated general medical condition (n = 3), new noncolorectal cancer (n = 2), patient refusal of further surgery (n = 2), and chronic constipation (n = 1). Reasons for end sigmoid stoma were unsatisfactory anorectal function (n = 22) and urgent surgery owing to anastomotic leakage (n = 3). The risk for permanent stomas in patients with symptomatic anastomotic leakage was 56% (25/45) compared with 11% (20/188) in those without symptomatic anastomotic leakage (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: One patient of 5 ended up with a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer, and half of the patients with a permanent stoma had previous symptomatic anastomotic leakage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21160312     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd2948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  62 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong Zhi Geng; Dilidan Nasier; Bing Liu; Hua Gao; Yi Ke Xu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesco Saverio Mari; Tatiana Di Cesare; Luciano Novi; Marcello Gasparrini; Giammauro Berardi; Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca; Andrea Liverani; Antonio Brescia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES Technology and Value Assessment Committee safety and effectiveness analysis on immunofluorescence in the operating room for biliary visualization and perfusion assessment.

Authors:  Bryan J Sandler; Danny Sherwinter; Lucian Panait; Richard Parent; Jennifer Schwartz; David Renton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment.

Authors:  Freek Daams; Misha Luyer; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seok In Seo; Chang Sik Yu; Gwon Sik Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic single-port sigmoid resection: combined transanal and transabdominal minimal invasive management.

Authors:  Walter Brunner; Andrea Rossetti; Larissa Clea Vines; Nabil Kalak; Stephan Andreas Bischofberger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancers: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Stoma.

Authors:  Joanna Chung Kiu Mak; Dominic Chi Chung Foo; Rockson Wei; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Risk factors for permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Hun Jin Kim; Chang Hyun Kim; Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Management of low colorectal anastomotic leak: Preserving the anastomosis.

Authors:  Jennifer Blumetti; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.