Literature DB >> 29532208

The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.

Ri Na Yoo1, Gun Kim1, Bong-Hyeon Kye1, Hyeon-Min Cho1, HyungJin Kim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sphincter-saving surgery is widely accepted operative modality to treat rectal cancer. It often requires temporary diverting stoma to avoid the complications of anastomotic failure. This study investigates the cumulative failure rate in sphincter preservation for rectal cancer and the risk factors associated with the permanent stoma.
METHODS: A retrospective study on 358 patients diagnosed with primary rectal cancer from 2009 to 2013 was conducted at a single institute. Three hundred and thirty-one out of 358 patients with rectal cancer located within 12 cm from the anal verge, who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery, were included in this study. The cumulative rate for permanent stoma was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed, comparing the patients with stoma to the ones without.
RESULTS: Temporary diverting stoma was created in 223 (82%) patients. After median follow-up of 42 months, 18 patients (6.6%) persistently used temporary stoma or required re-creation of stoma. Univariate analysis revealed that BMI, tumor location below 4 cm from the anal verge, coloanal anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, and local recurrence were significantly associated with persistent use or re-formation of stoma. Multivariate analysis showed that anastomotic leakage (OR 50.3; 95% CI, 10.1-250.1; p < 0.0001) and local recurrence (OR 11.3; 95% CI, 1.61-78.5; p = 0.015) were the independent risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Patients with anastomotic leakage and local recurrence are at high risk for permanent stoma. Not only should patients be fully informed of possible failure in sphincter preservation preoperatively, but also patient-oriented decision should be made on patient-tailored surgical plan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diverting stoma; Nonclosure; Rectal cancer; Sphincter preservation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532208     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3001-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  32 in total

1.  Functional outcome following rectal surgery-predisposing factors for low anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel Ll Hughes; Julie Cornish; Chris Morris
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bogdan C Paun; Scott Cassie; Anthony R MacLean; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Rickard Lindgren; Olof Hallböök; Jörgen Rutegård; Rune Sjödahl; Peter Matthiessen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With the Nonreversal Ileostomy Following Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Young Ah Kim; Gil Jae Lee; Sung Won Park; Won-Suk Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-30

5.  Association of Comorbidity with Anastomotic Leak, 30-day Mortality, and Length of Stay in Elective Surgery for Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peter-Martin Krarup; Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen; Lars Nannestad Jorgensen; Henrik Harling
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection.

Authors:  C M H Bailey; J M D Wheeler; M Birks; R Farouk
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 9.  Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak?

Authors:  Benjamin D Shogan; Erica M Carlisle; John C Alverdy; Konstantin Umanskiy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Intestinal tissues induce an SNP mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that enhances its virulence: possible role in anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Andrea D Olivas; Benjamin D Shogan; Vesta Valuckaite; Alexander Zaborin; Natalya Belogortseva; Mark Musch; Folker Meyer; William L Trimble; Gary An; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a case-matched study comparing TaTME versus standard laparoscopic TME.

Authors:  Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Michał Nowakowski; Mateusz Wierdak; Magdalena Mizera; Marcin Dembiński; Magdalena Pisarska; Piotr Major; Piotr Małczak; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.989

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.