Literature DB >> 23680361

Performance and limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for imaging very low activity sources.

Melissa I Freedenberg1, Ramsey D Badawi2, Alice F Tarantal3, Simon R Cherry4.   

Abstract

Emerging applications for positron emission tomography (PET) may require the ability to image very low activity source distributions in the body. The performance of clinical PET scanners in the regime where activity in the field of view is <1 MBq has not previously been explored. In this study, we compared the counting rate performance of two clinical PET/CT scanners, the Siemens Biograph Reveal 16 scanner which is based on lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detectors and the GE Discovery-ST scanner which is based on bismuth germanate (BGO) detectors using a modified National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007 protocol. Across the activity range studied (2-100 kBq/mL in a 5.5 mL line source in the NEMA scatter phantom), the BGO-based scanner significantly outperformed the LSO-based scanner. This was largely due to the effect of background counts emanating from naturally occurring but radioactive (176)Lu within the LSO detector material, which dominates the observed counting rate at the lowest activities. Increasing the lower energy threshold from 350 keV to 425 keV in an attempt to reduce this background did not significantly improve the measured NECR performance. The measured singles rate due to (176)Lu emissions within the scanner energy window was also found to be dependent on temperature, and to be affected by the operation of the CT component, making approaches to correct or compensate for the background more challenging. We conclude that for PET studies in a very low activity range, BGO-based scanners are likely to have better performance because of the lack of significant background.
Copyright © 2013 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low activity; Performance; Positron emission tomography scanners

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23680361      PMCID: PMC3795820          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  9 in total

1.  Effect of 176Lu background on singles transmission for LSO-based PET cameras.

Authors:  J S Huber; W W Moses; W F Jones; C C Watson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity.

Authors:  Charles C Watson; Michael E Casey; Lars Eriksson; Tim Mulnix; Doug Adams; Bernard Bendriem
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes.

Authors:  Osama Mawlawi; Donald A Podoloff; Steve Kohlmyer; John J Williams; Charles W Stearns; Randall F Culp; Homer Macapinlac
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Investigation of single, random, and true counts from natural radioactivity in LSO-based clinical PET.

Authors:  Seiichi Yamamoto; Hitoshi Horii; Mitsuru Hurutani; Keiichi Matsumoto; Michio Senda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  PET/CT Biograph Sensation 16. Performance improvement using faster electronics.

Authors:  M-J Martínez; Y Bercier; M Schwaiger; S I Ziegler
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.379

6.  Impact of the lower energy threshold on the NEMA NU2-2001 count-rate performance of a LSO based PET-CT scanner.

Authors:  J Eckardt; H Herzog; K P Schäfers; S Käpplinger; O Schober
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.379

7.  Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST.

Authors:  Valentino Bettinardi; Massimo Danna; Annarita Savi; Michela Lecchi; Isabella Castiglioni; Maria Carla Gilardi; Helmut Bammer; Giovanni Lucignani; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Scintillation crystals for PET.

Authors:  C L Melcher
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Imaging of weak-source distributions in LSO-based small-animal PET scanners.

Authors:  Andrew L Goertzen; Joon Young Suk; Christopher J Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 10.057

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Single-cell tracking with PET using a novel trajectory reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Keum Sil Lee; Tae Jin Kim; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Performance of Dual-Ended Readout PET Detectors Based on BGO Arrays and BaSO4 Reflector.

Authors:  Junwei Du
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-12

3.  Performance evaluation of dual-ended readout PET detectors based on BGO arrays with different reflector arrangements.

Authors:  Junwei Du; Qian Wang; Chih-Chieh Liu; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  Simulation study of a coincidence detection system for non-invasive determination of arterial blood time-activity curve measurements.

Authors:  Yassine Toufique; Othmane Bouhali; Pauline Negre; Jim O' Doherty
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-07

5.  Radiolabeling human peripheral blood stem cells for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in young rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Alice F Tarantal; C Chang I Lee; David L Kukis; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.