Literature DB >> 14770270

Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST.

Valentino Bettinardi1, Massimo Danna, Annarita Savi, Michela Lecchi, Isabella Castiglioni, Maria Carla Gilardi, Helmut Bammer, Giovanni Lucignani, Ferruccio Fazio.   

Abstract

Characterisation of the physical performance of the new integrated PET/CT system Discovery ST (GE Medical Systems) has been performed following the NEMA NU 2-1994 (N-94) and the NEMA NU 2-2001 (N-01) standards in both 2D and 3D acquisition configuration. The Discovery ST combines a four or eight multi-slice helical CT scanner with a PET tomograph which consists of 10,080 BGO crystals arranged in 24 rings. The crystal dimensions are 6.3 x 6.3 x 30 mm(3) and they are organised in blocks of 6 x 6 crystals, coupled to a single photomultiplier tube with four anodes. The 24 rings of the PET system allow 47 images to be obtained, spaced by 3.27 mm, and covering an axial field of view of 157 mm. The low- and high-energy thresholds are set to 375 and 650 keV, respectively. The coincidence time window is set to 11.7 ns. Using the NEMA N-94 standard, the main results were: (1) the average (radial and tangential) transverse spatial resolution (FWHM) at 1, 10 and 20 cm off axis was 6.28 mm, 7.09 mm and 7.45 mm in 2D, and 6.68 mm, 7.72 mm and 8.13 mm in 3D; (2) the sensitivity for true events was 8,567 cps/kBq/cc in 2D and 36,649 cps/kBq/cc in 3D; (3) the scatter fraction was 15% in 2D and 30% in 3D; (4) the peak true events rate, the true events rate at 50% of the system dead-time and the true events rate when equal to the random events rate were 750 kcps at 189.81 kBq/cc, 744 kcps at 186.48 kBq/cc and 686 kcps at 150.59 kBq/cc, respectively, in 2D, and 922 kcps at 44.03 kBq/cc, 834 kcps at 53.28 kBq/cc and 921 kcps at 44.03 kBq/cc in 3D; (5) the noise equivalent count (NEC) peak rate was 270 kcps at 34.38 kBq/cc in 3D, with random coincidences estimated by delayed events. Using the NEMA N-01 standards the main results were: (1) the average transverse and axial spatial resolution (FWHM) at 1 cm and 10 cm off axis was 6.28 (4.56) mm and 6.88 (6.11) mm in 2D, and 6.29 (5.68) mm and 6.82 (6.05) mm in 3D; (2) the average sensitivity for the two radial positions (r=0 cm and r=10 cm) was 1.93 cps/kBq in 2D and 9.12 cps/kBq in 3D; (3) the scatter fraction was 19% in 2D and 45% in 3D; (4) the NEC peak rate was 54 kcps at 46.99 kBq/cc in 2D and 45.5 kcps at 10.84 kBq/cc in 3D, when random coincidences were estimated by using k=2 in the NEC formula, while the NEC peak rate was 81 kcps at 64.43 kBq/cc and 66 kcps at 14.86 kBq/cc in 2D and 3D, respectively, when random coincidences were estimated by using k=1 in the NEC formula. The new integrated PET-CT system Discovery ST has good overall performances in both 2D and 3D, with in particular a high sensitivity and a very good 3D NEC response.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14770270     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1444-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  14 in total

Review 1.  From PET detectors to PET scanners.

Authors:  John L Humm; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Alberto Del Guerra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology.

Authors:  T Beyer; D W Townsend; T M Blodgett
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-03

3.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Michael E Casey; Frank P DiFilippo; Horace Hines; Gerd Muehllehner; Vilim Simcic; Charles W Stearns; Lars-Eric Adam; Steve Kohlmyer; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion.

Authors:  David W Townsend; Thomas Beyer; Todd M Blodgett
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  J S Karp; M E Daube-Witherspoon; E J Hoffman; T K Lewellen; J M Links; W H Wong; R D Hichwa; M E Casey; J G Colsher; R E Hitchens
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; T G Turkington; J J Williams; C W Stearns; J M Hoffman; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  PET/CT in diagnostic oncology.

Authors:  C Messa; V Bettinardi; M Picchio; E Pelosi; C Landoni; L Gianolli; M C Gilardi; F Fazio
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 8.  Functional imaging in treatment planning in radiation therapy: a review.

Authors:  Carlos A Perez; Jeffrey Bradley; Clifford K S Chao; Perry W Grigsby; Sasa Mutic; Robert Malyapa
Journal:  Rays       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep

9.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Medhat Osman; Christian Cohade; Laura T Marshall; Jonathan M Links; Steve Kohlmyer; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Primer on molecular imaging technology.

Authors:  Craig S Levin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Performance of the new generation of whole-body PET/CT scanners: Discovery STE and Discovery VCT.

Authors:  M Teräs; T Tolvanen; J J Johansson; J J Williams; J Knuuti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Dual-phase FDG-PET: delayed acquisition improves hepatic detectability of pathological uptake.

Authors:  V Arena; A Skanjeti; R Casoni; A Douroukas; E Pelosi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  PET/CT imaging: effect of respiratory motion on apparent myocardial uptake.

Authors:  Ludovic Le Meunier; Roberto Maass-Moreno; Jorge A Carrasquillo; William Dieckmann; Stephen L Bacharach
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Validation of 18F-FDG-PET Single-Subject Optimized SPM Procedure with Different PET Scanners.

Authors:  Luca Presotto; Tommaso Ballarini; Silvia Paola Caminiti; Valentino Bettinardi; Luigi Gianolli; Daniela Perani
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2017-04

7.  Development of a high-sensitivity BGO well counter for small animal PET studies.

Authors:  Seiichi Yamamoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yasukazu Kanai; Tadashi Watabe; Masao Imaizumi; Eku Shimosegawa; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-10-11

8.  Optimization of injection dose based on noise-equivalent count rate with use of an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom in three-dimensional 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Kazumasa Inoue; Hideo Kurosawa; Takashi Tanaka; Masahiro Fukushi; Noriyuki Moriyama; Hirofumi Fujii
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-12-30

9.  68Ga-DOTANOC: biodistribution and dosimetry in patients affected by neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  C Pettinato; A Sarnelli; M Di Donna; S Civollani; C Nanni; G Montini; D Di Pierro; M Ferrari; M Marengo; C Bergamini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Performance and limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for imaging very low activity sources.

Authors:  Melissa I Freedenberg; Ramsey D Badawi; Alice F Tarantal; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.