M-J Martínez1, Y Bercier, M Schwaiger, S I Ziegler. 1. Nuclear Medicine Department, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Muenchen, Germany. m.j.martinez@lrz.tum.de
Abstract
AIM: The new PET/CT Biograph Sensation 16 (BS16) tomographs have faster detector electronics which allow a reduced timing coincidence window and an increased lower energy threshold (from 350 to 400 keV). This paper evaluates the performance of the BS16 PET scanner before and after the Pico-3D electronics upgrade. METHODS: Four NEMA NU 2-2001 protocols, (i) spatial resolution, (ii) scatter fraction, count losses and random measurement, (iii) sensitivity, and (iv) image quality, have been performed. RESULTS: A considerable change in both PET count-rate performance and image quality is observed after electronics upgrade. The new scatter fraction obtained using Pico-3D electronics showed a 14% decrease compared to that obtained with the previous electronics. At the typical patient background activity (5.3 kBq/ml), the new scatter fraction was approximately 0.42. The noise equivalent count-rate (R(NEC)) performance was also improved. The value at which the R(NEC) curve peaked, increased from 3.7 x 10(4) s(-1) at 14 kBq/ml to 6.4 x 10(4) s(-1) at 21 kBq/ml (2R-NEC rate). Likewise, the peak true count-rate value increased from 1.9 x 10(5) s(-1) at 22 kBq/ml to 3.4 x 10(5) s(-1) at 33 kBq/ml. An average increase of 45% in contrast was observed for hot spheres when using AW-OSEM (4ix8s) as the reconstruction algorithm. For cold spheres, the average increase was 12%. CONCLUSION: The performance of the PET scanners in the BS16 tomographs is improved by the optimization of the signal processing. The narrower energy and timing coincidence windows lead to a considerable increase of signal- to-noise ratio. The existing combination of fast detectors and adapted electronics in the BS16 tomographs allow imaging protocols with reduced acquisition time, providing higher patient throughput.
AIM: The new PET/CT Biograph Sensation 16 (BS16) tomographs have faster detector electronics which allow a reduced timing coincidence window and an increased lower energy threshold (from 350 to 400 keV). This paper evaluates the performance of the BS16 PET scanner before and after the Pico-3D electronics upgrade. METHODS: Four NEMA NU 2-2001 protocols, (i) spatial resolution, (ii) scatter fraction, count losses and random measurement, (iii) sensitivity, and (iv) image quality, have been performed. RESULTS: A considerable change in both PET count-rate performance and image quality is observed after electronics upgrade. The new scatter fraction obtained using Pico-3D electronics showed a 14% decrease compared to that obtained with the previous electronics. At the typical patient background activity (5.3 kBq/ml), the new scatter fraction was approximately 0.42. The noise equivalent count-rate (R(NEC)) performance was also improved. The value at which the R(NEC) curve peaked, increased from 3.7 x 10(4) s(-1) at 14 kBq/ml to 6.4 x 10(4) s(-1) at 21 kBq/ml (2R-NEC rate). Likewise, the peak true count-rate value increased from 1.9 x 10(5) s(-1) at 22 kBq/ml to 3.4 x 10(5) s(-1) at 33 kBq/ml. An average increase of 45% in contrast was observed for hot spheres when using AW-OSEM (4ix8s) as the reconstruction algorithm. For cold spheres, the average increase was 12%. CONCLUSION: The performance of the PET scanners in the BS16 tomographs is improved by the optimization of the signal processing. The narrower energy and timing coincidence windows lead to a considerable increase of signal- to-noise ratio. The existing combination of fast detectors and adapted electronics in the BS16 tomographs allow imaging protocols with reduced acquisition time, providing higher patient throughput.
Authors: Ralph A Bundschuh; Axel Martínez-Möller; Markus Essler; Stephan G Nekolla; Sibylle I Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sweet Ping Ng; Richard Khor; Mathias Bressel; Michael MacManus; John F Seymour; Rodney J Hicks; Andrew Wirth Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ken Herrmann; Ralph A Bundschuh; Robert Rosenberg; Stefan Schmidt; Christine Praus; Michael Souvatzoglou; Karen Becker; Tibor Schuster; Markus Essler; Hinrich A Wieder; Helmut Friess; Sibylle I Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger; Bernd J Krause Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Ralph A Bundschuh; Christina M Wendl; Gregor Weirich; Mathias Eiber; Michael Souvatzoglou; Uwe Treiber; Hubert Kübler; Tobias Maurer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hans Geinitz; Anca L Grosu; Sibylle I Ziegler; Bernd Joachim Krause Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Thomas Pyka; Ralph A Bundschuh; Nicolaus Andratschke; Benedikt Mayer; Hanno M Specht; Laszló Papp; Norbert Zsótér; Markus Essler Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 3.481