Literature DB >> 23652814

Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Ann E Geers1, Lisa S Davidson, Rosalie M Uchanski, Johanna G Nicholas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study documented the ability of experienced pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users to perceive linguistic properties (what is said) and indexical attributes (emotional intent and talker identity) of speech, and examined the extent to which linguistic (LSP) and indexical (ISP) perception skills are related. Preimplant-aided hearing, age at implantation, speech processor technology, CI-aided thresholds, sequential bilateral cochlear implantation, and academic integration with hearing age-mates were examined for their possible relationships to both LSP and ISP skills.
DESIGN: Sixty 9- to 12-year olds, first implanted at an early age (12 to 38 months), participated in a comprehensive test battery that included the following LSP skills: (1) recognition of monosyllabic words at loud and soft levels, (2) repetition of phonemes and suprasegmental features from nonwords, and (3) recognition of key words from sentences presented within a noise background, and the following ISP skills: (1) discrimination of across-gender and within-gender (female) talkers and (2) identification and discrimination of emotional content from spoken sentences. A group of 30 age-matched children without hearing loss completed the nonword repetition, and talker- and emotion-perception tasks for comparison.
RESULTS: Word-recognition scores decreased with signal level from a mean of 77% correct at 70 dB SPL to 52% at 50 dB SPL. On average, CI users recognized 50% of key words presented in sentences that were 9.8 dB above background noise. Phonetic properties were repeated from nonword stimuli at about the same level of accuracy as suprasegmental attributes (70 and 75%, respectively). The majority of CI users identified emotional content and differentiated talkers significantly above chance levels. Scores on LSP and ISP measures were combined into separate principal component scores and these components were highly correlated (r = 0.76). Both LSP and ISP component scores were higher for children who received a CI at the youngest ages, upgraded to more recent CI technology and had lower CI-aided thresholds. Higher scores, for both LSP and ISP components, were also associated with higher language levels and mainstreaming at younger ages. Higher ISP scores were associated with better social skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Results strongly support a link between indexical and linguistic properties in perceptual analysis of speech. These two channels of information appear to be processed together in parallel by the auditory system and are inseparable in perception. Better speech performance, for both linguistic and indexical perception, is associated with younger age at implantation and use of more recent speech processor technology. Children with better speech perception demonstrated better spoken language, earlier academic mainstreaming, and placement in more typically sized classrooms (i.e., >20 students). Well-developed social skills were more highly associated with the ability to discriminate the nuances of talker identity and emotion than with the ability to recognize words and sentences through listening. The extent to which early cochlear implantation enabled these early-implanted children to make use of both linguistic and indexical properties of speech influenced not only their development of spoken language, but also their ability to function successfully in a hearing world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652814      PMCID: PMC3740036          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828d2bd6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  71 in total

1.  Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: suprasegmental analyses.

Authors:  Allyson K Carter; Caitlin M Dillon; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  Effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for profoundly deaf children: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Bond; J Elston; S Mealing; R Anderson; G Weiner; R S Taylor; Z Liu; K Stein
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sato; John S Bradley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Enduring advantages of early cochlear implantation for spoken language development.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Influence of voice similarity on talker discrimination in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alain S Uziel; Martine Sillon; Adrienne Vieu; Françoise Artieres; Jean-Pierre Piron; Jean-Pierre Daures; Michel Mondain
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Shanna L Allen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas; Andreas Loth; Thomas Zahnert; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Evaluation of a New Algorithm to Optimize Audibility in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Noël Y Dwyer; Amy L Stein; Leo M Litvak
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Preimplant Hearing Aid Fittings and Aided Audibility for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Alissa Nickerson; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Segmental and Suprasegmental Perception in Children Using Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Kaitlyn A Wenrich; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Danielle J Zion; Mickael L Deroche; Brooke A Burianek; Charles J Limb; Alison P Goren; Aditya M Kulkarni; Julie A Christensen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.

Authors:  Deepa Suneel; Lisa S Davidson; Judith Lieu
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2019-10-07

9.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Children's Recognition of Emotional Prosody in Spectrally Degraded Speech Is Predicted by Their Age and Cognitive Status.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Danielle J Zion; Aditya M Kulkarni; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.