Literature DB >> 33357341

Cochlear Implantation.

Stefan Dazert1, Jan Peter Thomas, Andreas Loth, Thomas Zahnert, Timo Stöver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hearing impairment that is too severe to be adequately treated with conventional hearing aids can lead, in children, to severe developmental disturbances of hearing and language, and, in adults, to communicative and social deprivation. Recent advances in medical device technology and in microsurgical techniques have led to an expansion of the indications for cochlear implantation (CI) for adults with progressive hearing loss in older age, and to a restructuring of the process of care for these patients in Germany.
METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as on the CI guidelines and CI "white book" of the German Society of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.
RESULTS: Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for the successful auditory rehabilitation of high-grade hearing impairment. In children, a key role is played by newborn auditory screening, which is mandatory in Germany and enables the provision of a CI in the first year of life when necessary. 86% of the children receiving a CI achieve linguistic comprehension of fluently spoken sentences. For adults, positive prognostic factors for hearing after the provision of a CI include a highly motivated patient, "postlingual" onset of the hearing impairment (i.e., after the acquisition of language), and a brief duration of deafness. Auditory rehabilitation is associated with significant improvement, not just of hearing and of the comprehension of spoken language, but also of quality of life, particularly in elderly patients. For patients of any age with bilateral hearing loss, CIs should be provided on both sides, if possible. The more common complications of the procedure, with a probability of 2-4% each, are technical implant defects, dizziness, and wound-healing disturbances.
CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation, performed in specialized centers, is a safe and reliable technique and regularly enables the successful rehabilitation of hearing in both children and adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33357341      PMCID: PMC7851969          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  48 in total

1.  Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.

Authors:  Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Anna Piotrowska; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Chris James; Domenico Cuda; Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor; Bruno Frachet; Johan H M Frijns; Thomas Klenzner; Roland Laszig; Manuel Manrique; Mathieu Marx; Paul Merkus; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Erwin Offeciers; Joerg Pesch; Angel Ramos-Macias; Alain Robier; Olivier Sterkers; Alain Uziel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Predicting Performance and Non-Use in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marc J W Lammers; Huib Versnel; Vedat Topsakal; Gijsbert A van Zanten; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Rousset; Richard Dowell; Jaime Leigh
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: Does Age Matter?

Authors:  Katharina Rohloff; Mario Koopmann; Daniel Wei; Claudia Rudack; Eleftherios Savvas
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Long-Term Outcomes, Education, and Occupational Level in Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Were Implanted in Childhood.

Authors:  Angelika Illg; Marius Haack; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Intraoperative findings on ECAP-measurement: normal or special case?

Authors:  Alexander Müller; Thomas Hocke; Parwis Mir-Salim
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Maximum preimplantation monosyllabic score as predictor of cochlear implant outcome.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoppe; Thomas Hocke; Anne Hast; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping review.

Authors:  Isabelle Boisvert; Mariana Reis; Agnes Au; Robert Cowan; Richard C Dowell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can cochlear implantation improve neurocognition in the aging population?

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Lisa Götze; Stefan Dazert; Michael Falkenstein; Jan Peter Thomas
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.458

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Validity and reliability of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in German].

Authors:  Michaela Plath; Matthias Sand; Philipp S van de Weyer; Kilian Baierl; Mark Praetorius; Peter K Plinkert; Ingo Baumann; Karim Zaoui
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 1.330

2.  Cognition and Cognitive Reserve in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Lisa Götze; Marcel Bajewski; Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Nonverbal synchrony in subjects with hearing impairment and their significant others.

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Kirsten Oberländer; Sophie Mertens; Fabian T Ramseyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-18

4.  Diagnosing complications following cochlear implantation using transcutaneous ultrasound.

Authors:  Robin Rupp; Vivian Thimsen; Matthias Balk; Sarina K Mueller; Matti Sievert; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Ulrich Hoppe; Joachim Hornung; Heinrich Iro; Antoniu-Oreste Gostian
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.236

5.  Poor Performer: A Distinct Entity in Cochlear Implant Users?

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Kirsten Oberländer; Imme Haubitz; Rebecca Carroll; Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.213

6.  Effect of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline and quality of life in younger and older adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Javier Gavilán; M Auxiliadora Gutiérrez-Revilla; Rubén Polo; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.236

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.