Literature DB >> 18397014

Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms.

Hiroshi Sato1, John S Bradley.   

Abstract

Detailed acoustical measurements were made in 41 working elementary school classrooms near Ottawa, Canada to obtain more representative and more accurate indications of the acoustical quality of conditions for speech communication during actual teaching activities. This paper describes the room acoustics characteristics and noise environment of 27 traditional rectangular classrooms from the 41 measured rooms. The purpose of the work was to better understand how to improve speech communication between teachers and students. The study found, that on average, the students experienced: teacher speech levels of 60.4 dB A, noise levels of 49.1 dB A, and a mean speech-to-noise ratio of 11 dB A during teaching activities. The mean reverberation time in the occupied classrooms was 0.41 s, which was 10% less than in the unoccupied rooms. The reverberation time measurements were used to determine the average absorption added by each student. Detailed analyses of early and late-arriving speech sounds showed these sound levels could be predicted quite accurately and suggest improved approaches to room acoustics design.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18397014     DOI: 10.1121/1.2839283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Sound levels and their effects on children in a German primary school.

Authors:  Katrin Eysel-Gosepath; Tobias Daut; Andreas Pinger; Walter Lehmacher; Thomas Erren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Speech-Processing Fatigue in Children: Auditory Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  Alexandra P Key; Samantha J Gustafson; Lindsey Rentmeester; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Fred H Bess
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Ambulatory monitoring of Lombard-related vocal characteristics in vocally healthy female speakers.

Authors:  Thomas H Whittico; Andrew J Ortiz; Katherine L Marks; Laura E Toles; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Jody L Spalding
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Children's understanding of instructions presented in noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Crystal M Manninen; Daniel L Valente; Nicholas A Smith
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.