Literature DB >> 31518517

Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Lisa S Davidson1, Ann E Geers2, Rosalie M Uchanski1, Jill B Firszt1.   

Abstract

Purpose The overall goal of the current study was to identify an optimal level and duration of acoustic experience that facilitates language development for pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients-specifically, to determine whether there is an optimal duration of hearing aid (HA) use and unaided threshold levels that should be considered before proceeding to bilateral CIs. Method A total of 117 pediatric CI recipients (ages 5-9 years) were given speech perception and standardized tests of receptive vocabulary and language. The speech perception battery included tests of segmental perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet and noise, and vowels and consonants in quiet) and of suprasegmental perception (e.g., talker and stress discrimination, and emotion identification). Hierarchical regression analyses were used to determine the effects of speech perception on language scores, and the effects of residual hearing level (unaided pure-tone average [PTA]) and duration of HA use on speech perception. Results A continuum of residual hearing levels and the length of HA use were represented by calculating the unaided PTA of the ear with the longest duration of HA use for each child. All children wore 2 devices: Some wore bimodal devices, while others received their 2nd CI either simultaneously or sequentially, representing a wide range of HA use (0.03-9.05 years). Regression analyses indicate that suprasegmental perception contributes unique variance to receptive language scores and that both segmental and suprasegmental skills each contribute independently to receptive vocabulary scores. Also, analyses revealed an optimal duration of HA use for each of 3 ranges of hearing loss severity (with mean PTAs of 73, 92, and 111 dB HL) that maximizes suprasegmental perception. Conclusions For children with the most profound losses, early bilateral CIs provide the greatest opportunity for developing good spoken language skills. For those with moderate-to-severe losses, however, a prescribed period of bimodal use may be more advantageous for developing good spoken language skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31518517      PMCID: PMC6808345          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  76 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children with residual hearing.

Authors:  Michel Mondain; Martine Sillon; Adrienne Vieu; Ann Levi; Françoise Reuillard-Artieres; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse; Nadine Cochard; Eric Truy; Alain Uziel
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  A meta-analysis to compare speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Erin C Schafer; Amyn M Amlani; Daniele Paiva; Ladan Nozari; Sybil Verret
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Richard C Dowell; Shani J Dettman; Peter J Blamey; Elizabeth J Barker; Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2002-03

5.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.

Authors:  J R Saffran; R N Aslin; E L Newport
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The effects of asymmetric hearing on bilateral brainstem function: findings in children with bimodal (electric and acoustic) hearing.

Authors:  Melissa J Polonenko; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Evidence-based approach for making cochlear implant recommendations for infants with residual hearing.

Authors:  Jaime Leigh; Shani Dettman; Richard Dowell; Julia Sarant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Early predictors of phonological and morphosyntactic skills in second graders with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Christopher Holloman
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-04-12

10.  New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant.

Authors:  André L L Sampaio; Mercêdes F S Araújo; Carlos A C P Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-13
View more
  12 in total

1.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

2.  Considerations in pediatric device candidacy: An emphasis on spoken language.

Authors:  Natalie A Hayes; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Spectral Modulation Detection Performance and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Pitch Accuracy of Vocal Singing in Deaf Children With Bimodal Hearing and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Li Xu; Jing Yang; Emily Hahn; Rosalie Uchanski; Lisa Davidson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) in Children: Investigating Benefit Afforded by Bilateral Versus Unilateral Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Jillian B Roberts; G Christopher Stecker; Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants or Bimodal Hearing for Children with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  René H Gifford
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2020-10-02

7.  Spatial Release From Masking in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Lisa R Park; Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Brendan P O'Connell; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Children With Normal Hearing, Hearing Aids, and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Curtis L Hartling; Jennifer R Fowler; Gemaine N Stark; Bess Glickman; Morgan Eddolls; Yonghee Oh; Katrina Ramsey; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; J Thomas Roland; Denise Thomas; Kristin Uhler; Lindsay Zombek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Listening in Noise Remains a Significant Challenge for Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence from Early Deafened and Those with Progressive Hearing Loss Compared to Peers with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Yossi Bugannim; Doreen Zechoval; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Ronen Perez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.