Literature DB >> 31044697

Preimplant Hearing Aid Fittings and Aided Audibility for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Alissa Nickerson1, Lisa S Davidson2,3,4, Rosalie M Uchanski2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Audibility of speech for children with hearing loss (HL) depends on the degree of HL and the fitting of the hearing aids (HAs) themselves. Many studies on cochlear implant (CI) users have demonstrated that preimplant hearing is associated with postimplant outcomes, but there have been very few reports on the fitting of HAs before surgery.
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to characterize HA fittings and aided audibility of speech for pediatric HA users with severe to profound HL and to examine the relation between preimplant aided audibility and postimplant speech perception. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A descriptive/observational and correlational study. Audiologic records of pediatric CI participants involved in a larger study examining the effects of early acoustic hearing were analyzed retrospectively; when available, these records included HA verification and speech recognition performance. STUDY SAMPLE: The CI participants were enrolled in audiology centers and oral schools for the deaf across the United States. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: To determine whether deviations from prescribed DSL target were significantly greater than zero, 95% confidence intervals of the mean deviation were calculated for each frequency (250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz). Correlational analyses were used to examine the relationship between preimplant aided Speech Intelligibility Indices (SIIs) and postimplant speech perception in noise. Correlational analyses were also used to explore the relationship between preimplant aided SIIs and demographic data. T-tests were used to compare preimplant-aided SIIs of HAs of listeners who later became users of either sequential CIs, simultaneous CIs, or bimodal devices.
RESULTS: Preimplant fittings of HAs were generally very close to prescriptive targets, except at 4000 Hz for those HAs with active frequency-lowering processing, and preimplant SIIs, albeit low, were correlated with postimplant speech recognition performance in noise. These results suggest that aided audibility should be maximized throughout the HA trial for later speech recognition purposes.
CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that HA fittings be optimized to support speech audibility even when considering implantation. In addition to the age at which HA use begins, the aided audibility itself is important in determining CI candidacy and decisions regarding bimodal HA use. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31044697      PMCID: PMC6750978          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  29 in total

Review 1.  New frontiers in cochlear implantation: acoustic plus electric hearing, hearing preservation, and more.

Authors:  Sarah E Mowry; Erika Woodson; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Hearing instrument fittings of pre-school children: do we meet the prescription goals?

Authors:  Susan Strauss; Catherine van Dijk
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol (UWO PedAMP).

Authors:  Marlene P Bagatto; Sheila T Moodie; April C Malandrino; Frances M Richert; Debbie A Clench; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

5.  Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age.

Authors:  Johanna Grant Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Ruth Bentler; Lenore Holte; Patricia Roush; Jacob Oleson; John Van Buren; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Jon K Shallop; Sarah A Sydlowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The influence of hearing aids on the speech and language development of children with hearing loss.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Jacob J Oleson; Sophie E Ambrose; Elizabeth Walker; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Fit-to-Targets for the Desired Sensation Level Version 5.0a Hearing Aid Prescription Method for Children.

Authors:  Sheila T F Moodie; Susan D Scollie; Marlene P Bagatto; Kelley Keene
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant.

Authors:  André L L Sampaio; Mercêdes F S Araújo; Carlos A C P Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Spoken Language Skills in Children With Bilateral Hearing Aids or Bilateral Cochlear Implants at the Age of Three Years.

Authors:  Taina T Välimaa; Sari Kunnari; Antti A Aarnisalo; Aarno Dietz; Antti Hyvärinen; Jaakko Laitakari; Sari Mykkänen; Satu Rimmanen; Jaakko Salonen; Ville Sivonen; Tanja Tennilä; Teija Tsupari; Sari Vikman; Nonna Virokannas; Päivi Laukkanen-Nevala; Anna-Kaisa Tolonen; Krista Tuohimaa; Heikki Löppönen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.