Literature DB >> 25448167

Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.

Monita Chatterjee1, Danielle J Zion2, Mickael L Deroche3, Brooke A Burianek4, Charles J Limb3, Alison P Goren5, Aditya M Kulkarni4, Julie A Christensen4.   

Abstract

Despite their remarkable success in bringing spoken language to hearing impaired listeners, the signal transmitted through cochlear implants (CIs) remains impoverished in spectro-temporal fine structure. As a consequence, pitch-dominant information such as voice emotion, is diminished. For young children, the ability to correctly identify the mood/intent of the speaker (which may not always be visible in their facial expression) is an important aspect of social and linguistic development. Previous work in the field has shown that children with cochlear implants (cCI) have significant deficits in voice emotion recognition relative to their normally hearing peers (cNH). Here, we report on voice emotion recognition by a cohort of 36 school-aged cCI. Additionally, we provide for the first time, a comparison of their performance to that of cNH and NH adults (aNH) listening to CI simulations of the same stimuli. We also provide comparisons to the performance of adult listeners with CIs (aCI), most of whom learned language primarily through normal acoustic hearing. Results indicate that, despite strong variability, on average, cCI perform similarly to their adult counterparts; that both groups' mean performance is similar to aNHs' performance with 8-channel noise-vocoded speech; that cNH achieve excellent scores in voice emotion recognition with full-spectrum speech, but on average, show significantly poorer scores than aNH with 8-channel noise-vocoded speech. A strong developmental effect was observed in the cNH with noise-vocoded speech in this task. These results point to the considerable benefit obtained by cochlear-implanted children from their devices, but also underscore the need for further research and development in this important and neglected area. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Lasker Award>.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448167      PMCID: PMC4615700          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  47 in total

1.  Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  Chao-Gang Wei; Keli Cao; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

4.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Emotion understanding in deaf children with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Carin H Wiefferink; Carolien Rieffe; Lizet Ketelaar; Leo De Raeve; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2012-12-10

7.  Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; J Bruce Tomblin; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Emotion recognition/understanding ability in hearing or vision-impaired children: do sounds, sights, or words make the difference?

Authors:  Murray J Dyck; Charles Farrugia; Ian M Shochet; Martez Holmes-Brown
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.982

10.  Children discover the spectral skeletons in their native language before the amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Robert R Packer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  38 in total

1.  Toddlers' comprehension of degraded signals: Noise-vocoded versus sine-wave analogs.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Monita Chatterjee; Giovanna Morini; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Intelligibility of naturally produced and synthesized Mandarin speech by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying Shi; Jingyuan Chen; Yue Gong; Biao Chen; Yongxin Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).

Authors:  Adrienne S Roman; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Judgments of Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech by Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Shae D Morgan; Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Yang-Wenyi Liu; Duo-Duo Tao; Bing Chen; Xiaoting Cheng; Yilai Shu; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Toddlers' fast-mapping from noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Emily Shroads; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.

Authors:  Deepa Suneel; Lisa S Davidson; Judith Lieu
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2019-10-07

10.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.