Literature DB >> 30074504

Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Shauntelle A Cannon1,2, Monita Chatterjee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Emotional communication is important in children's social development. Previous studies have shown deficits in voice emotion recognition by children with moderate-to-severe hearing loss or with cochlear implants. Little, however, is known about emotion recognition in children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The objective of this study was to compare voice emotion recognition by children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss relative to their peers with normal hearing, under conditions in which the emotional prosody was either more or less exaggerated (child-directed or adult-directed speech, respectively). We hypothesized that the performance of children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss would be comparable to their normally hearing peers when tested with child-directed materials but would show significant deficits in emotion recognition when tested with adult-directed materials, which have reduced prosodic cues.
DESIGN: Nineteen school-aged children (8 to 14 years of age) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss and 20 children with normal hearing aged 6 to 17 years participated in the study. A group of 11 young, normally hearing adults was also tested. Stimuli comprised sentences spoken in one of five emotions (angry, happy, sad, neutral, and scared), either in a child-directed or in an adult-directed manner. The task was a single-interval, five-alternative forced-choice paradigm, in which the participants heard each sentence in turn and indicated which of the five emotions was associated with that sentence. Reaction time was also recorded as a measure of cognitive load.
RESULTS: Acoustic analyses confirmed the exaggerated prosodic cues in the child-directed materials relative to the adult-directed materials. Results showed significant effects of age, specific emotion (happy, sad, etc.), and test materials (better performance with child-directed materials) in both groups of children, as well as susceptibility to talker variability. Contrary to our hypothesis, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups of children in either emotion recognition (percent correct or d' values) or in reaction time, with either child- or adult-directed materials. Among children with hearing loss, degree of hearing loss (mild or moderate) did not predict performance. In children with hearing loss, interactions between vocabulary, materials, and age were observed, such that older children with stronger vocabulary showed better performance with child-directed speech. Such interactions were not observed in children with normal hearing. The pattern of results was broadly consistent across the different measures of accuracy, d', and reaction time.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss do not have significant deficits in overall voice emotion recognition compared with their normally hearing peers, but mechanisms involved may be different between the 2 groups. The results suggest a stronger role for linguistic ability in emotion recognition by children with normal hearing than by children with hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30074504      PMCID: PMC6373174          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  59 in total

1.  Behavior rating inventory of executive function.

Authors:  Ida Sue Baron
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Intonation and emotion: influence of pitch levels and contour type on creating emotions.

Authors:  Emma Rodero
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual perceptions of emotions by young children with hearing loss versus children with normal hearing.

Authors:  Tova Most; Hilit Michaelis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Quality of life for children with cochlear implants: perceived benefits and problems and the perception of single words and emotional sounds.

Authors:  Efrat A Schorr; Froma P Roth; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning.

Authors:  D G Kemler Nelson; K Hirsh-Pasek; P W Jusczyk; K W Cassidy
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1989-02

7.  Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message?

Authors:  A Fernald
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1989-12

8.  Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Deaf children's understanding of emotions: desires take precedence.

Authors:  C Rieffe; M M Terwogt
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.982

10.  Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion.

Authors:  Disa A Sauter; Frank Eisner; Andrew J Calder; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  3 in total

1.  Age-Related Changes in Voice Emotion Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Perception of Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Emotional Speech in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Karen Chan Barrett; Monita Chatterjee; Meredith T Caldwell; Mickael L D Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Aditya M Kulkarni; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Margaret E Richter; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.