Literature DB >> 23572217

Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).

Likun Zhang1, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla, Woojin Ahn, Cristol Grosdemouge, Jesse M Rideout, Scott K Epstein, Suvranu De, Steven D Schwaitzberg, Daniel B Jones, Caroline G L Cao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mastering laparoscopic surgical skills requires considerable time and effort. The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST-PT(©)) is being developed as a computerized version of the peg transfer task of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) system using virtual reality technology. We assessed the learning curve of trainees on the VBLaST-PT(©) using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method and compared them with those on the FLS to establish convergent validity for the VBLaST-PT(©).
METHODS: Eighteen medical students from were assigned randomly to one of three groups: control, VBLaST-training, and FLS-training. The VBLaST and the FLS groups performed a total of 150 trials of the peg-transfer task over a 3-week period, 5 days a week. Their CUSUM scores were computed based on predefined performance criteria (junior, intermediate, and senior levels).
RESULTS: Of the six subjects in the VBLaST-training group, five achieved at least the "junior" level, three achieved the "intermediate" level, and one achieved the "senior" level of performance criterion by the end of the 150 trials. In comparison, for the FLS group, three students achieved the "senior" criterion and all six students achieved the "intermediate" and "junior" criteria by the 150th trials. Both the VBLaST-PT(©) and the FLS systems showed significant skill improvement and retention, albeit with system specificity as measured by transfer of learning in the retention test: The VBLaST-trained group performed better on the VBLaST-PT(©) than on FLS (p = 0.003), whereas the FLS-trained group performed better on the FLS than on VBLaST-PT(©) (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: We characterized the learning curve for a virtual peg transfer task on the VBLaST-PT(©) and compared it with the FLS using CUSUM analysis. Subjects in both training groups showed significant improvement in skill performance, but the transfer of training between systems was not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572217      PMCID: PMC3773010          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2932-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  Depth cue reliance in surgeons and medical students.

Authors:  J Shah; D Buckley; J Frisby; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill.

Authors:  S A Fraser; L S Feldman; D Stanbridge; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  A M Derossis; J Bothwell; H H Sigman; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; K Ritchie; N P Sheehy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  The use of a modular skills center for the maintenance of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  S J Shapiro; M Paz-Partlow; L Daykhovsky; L A Gordon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic skills enhancement.

Authors:  W S Melvin; J A Johnson; E C Ellison
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

8.  ERCP: a review of technical competency and workload in a small unit.

Authors:  M M Schlup; S M Williams; G O Barbezat
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Cusum plotting of temperature charts for assessing antimicrobial treatment in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  S E Kinsey; F J Giles; J Holton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-09-23

10.  Cusum as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee.

Authors:  A M Van Rij; J R McDonald; R A Pettigrew; M J Putterill; C K Reddy; J J Wright
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  17 in total

1.  Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.

Authors:  A Chellali; W Ahn; G Sankaranarayanan; J T Flinn; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; Suvranu De; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Characterizing the learning curve of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator VBLaST-SS©.

Authors:  Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Di Qi; Karthikeyan Panneerselvam; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Andinet Enquobahrie; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Training with cognitive load improves performance under similar conditions in a real surgical task.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Coleman A Odlozil; Katerina O Wells; Steven G Leeds; Sanket Chauhan; James W Fleshman; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  An objective approach to evaluate novice robotic surgeons using a combination of kinematics and stepwise cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses.

Authors:  William B Lyman; Michael J Passeri; Keith Murphy; Imran A Siddiqui; Adeel S Khan; David A Iannitti; John B Martinie; Erin H Baker; Dionisios Vrochides
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Woojin Ahn; Clairice Cooper; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Development and face validation of a virtual camera navigation task trainer.

Authors:  Venkata Arikatla; Sam Horvath; Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Suvranu De; Steve Schwaitzberg; Andinet Enquobahrie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Vessel ligation training via an adaptive simulation curriculum.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Robyn N Goodrich; Ivy A Le; Kendall D Brooks; Robert G Sawyer; Philip W Smith; Anneke T Schroen; Sara K Rasmussen
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.

Authors:  A Chellali; L Zhang; G Sankaranarayanan; V S Arikatla; W Ahn; A Derevianko; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; M DeMoya; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Validation of the VBLaST: A Virtual Peg Transfer Task in Gynecologic Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher Awtrey; Amine Chellali; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De; Daniel Jones; Caroline Cao
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.

Authors:  Ali M Linsk; Kimberley R Monden; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.