Literature DB >> 9826140

An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills.

A G Gallagher1, N McClure, J McGuigan, K Ritchie, N P Sheehy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The loss of three-dimensional visual depth cues has been thought to be the main hindrance to the acquisition of endoscopic skills. However, the "fulcrum effect" of the abdominal wall on the manipulation of instruments has not to our knowledge been previously investigated.
METHODS: Subjects with no experience in endoscopy were required to make multiple defined incisions under laparoscopic laboratory conditions, within ten two-minute periods in the first study and 50 in the second. Eleven subjects operated under normal imaging conditions and 11 with the y-axis inverted.
RESULTS: Subjects who operated with the image inverted made significantly more incisions and significantly more correct incisions than those working under normal conditions. This effect persisted over 50 trials.
CONCLUSIONS: The fulcrum effect has a major detrimental influence on acquisition of endoscopic skills. Further work is required to investigate the role of image inversion in clinical endoscopic training.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9826140     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1001366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  74 in total

1.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  B Zheng; Z Janmohamed; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; David A McClusky; Andrew B Lederman; Anthony G Gallagher; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; A B Lederman; K McGlade; R M Satava; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Enhanced mechanical transparency during practice impedes open-loop control of a complex tool.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Development and evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for surgical novices.

Authors:  Emmeline Nugent; Nicole Shirilla; Adnan Hafeez; Diarmuid S O'Riordain; Oscar Traynor; Anthony M Harrison; Paul Neary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Swee Chin Tan; Nicholas Marlow; John Field; Meryl Altree; Wendy Babidge; Peter Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Construct validity and educational role for motion analysis in a laparoscopic trainer.

Authors:  Maeve O'Neill Trudeau; Ahmed Nasr; Brian Carrillo; J Ted Gerstle; Georges Azzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Anatomical footprint for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using any energy source: a modified technique.

Authors:  B B Agarwal; Brij Agarwal; Manish Gupta; Sneh Agarwal; Krishan Mahajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.