Yinin Hu1, Robyn N Goodrich1, Ivy A Le1, Kendall D Brooks1, Robert G Sawyer1, Philip W Smith1, Anneke T Schroen2, Sara K Rasmussen3. 1. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. 3. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: skr3f@virginia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A cost-effective model for open vessel ligation is currently lacking. We hypothesized that a novel, inexpensive vessel ligation simulator can efficiently impart transferrable surgical skills to novice trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VesselBox was designed to simulate vessel ligation using surgical gloves as surrogate vessels. Fourth-year medical students performed ligations using VesselBox and were evaluated by surgical faculty using the Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills global rating scale and a task-specific checklist. Subsequently, each student was trained using VesselBox in an adaptive practice session guided by cumulative sum. Posttesting was performed on fresh human cadavers by evaluators blinded to pretest results. RESULTS: Sixteen students completed the study. VesselBox practice sessions averaged 21.8 min per participant (interquartile range 19.5-27.7). Blinded posttests demonstrated increased proficiency, as measured by both Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (3.23 versus 2.29, P < 0.001) and checklist metrics (7.33 versus 4.83, P < 0.001). Median speed improved from 128.2 s to 97.5 s per vessel ligated (P = 0.001). After this adaptive training protocol, practice volume was not associated with posttest performance. CONCLUSIONS: VesselBox is a cost-effective, low-fidelity vessel ligation model suitable for graduating medical students and junior residents. Cumulative sum can facilitate an adaptive, individualized curriculum for simulation training.
BACKGROUND: A cost-effective model for open vessel ligation is currently lacking. We hypothesized that a novel, inexpensive vessel ligation simulator can efficiently impart transferrable surgical skills to novice trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VesselBox was designed to simulate vessel ligation using surgical gloves as surrogate vessels. Fourth-year medical students performed ligations using VesselBox and were evaluated by surgical faculty using the Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills global rating scale and a task-specific checklist. Subsequently, each student was trained using VesselBox in an adaptive practice session guided by cumulative sum. Posttesting was performed on fresh human cadavers by evaluators blinded to pretest results. RESULTS: Sixteen students completed the study. VesselBox practice sessions averaged 21.8 min per participant (interquartile range 19.5-27.7). Blinded posttests demonstrated increased proficiency, as measured by both Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (3.23 versus 2.29, P < 0.001) and checklist metrics (7.33 versus 4.83, P < 0.001). Median speed improved from 128.2 s to 97.5 s per vessel ligated (P = 0.001). After this adaptive training protocol, practice volume was not associated with posttest performance. CONCLUSIONS: VesselBox is a cost-effective, low-fidelity vessel ligation model suitable for graduating medical students and junior residents. Cumulative sum can facilitate an adaptive, individualized curriculum for simulation training.
Authors: Rachel M Owen; Sebastian D Perez; Nathan Lytle; Ankit Patel; S S Davis; Edward Lin; John F Sweeney Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-04-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Martin Varley; Ryan Choi; Kean Kuan; Neil Bhardwaj; Markus Trochsler; Guy Maddern; Peter Hewett; Soeren Torge Mees Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Christopher R Davis; Edward C Toll; Anthony S Bates; Matthew D Cole; Frank C T Smith Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Yinin Hu; Ivy A Le; Robyn N Goodrich; Brandy L Edwards; Jacob R Gillen; Philip W Smith; Anneke T Schroen; Sara K Rasmussen Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Dimitrios Stefanidis; Nick Sevdalis; John Paige; Boris Zevin; Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Daniel B Jones Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S R Dawe; G N Pena; J A Windsor; J A J L Broeders; P C Cregan; P J Hewett; G J Maddern Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Yinin Hu; Joshua S Jolissaint; Adriana Ramirez; Ryan Gordon; Zequan Yang; Robert G Sawyer Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Daniel M Relles; Richard A Burkhart; Michael J Pucci; Jocelyn Sendecki; Renee Tholey; Ross Drueding; Patricia K Sauter; Eugene P Kennedy; Jordan M Winter; Harish Lavu; Charles J Yeo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Matthew G Mullen; Elise P Salerno; Alex D Michaels; Traci L Hedrick; Min-Woong Sohn; Philip W Smith; Bruce D Schirmer; Charles M Friel Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 2.891