Literature DB >> 12802650

Depth cue reliance in surgeons and medical students.

J Shah1, D Buckley, J Frisby, A Darzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depth perception is reduced in endoscopic surgery, although little is known about the effect this has on surgical performance.
METHODS: To assess the role of depth cues, 45 subjects completed tests of depth cue reliance. Surgical skill was assessed using the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality, a previously validated laparoscopic simulator.
RESULTS: We could demonstrate no difference in cue reliance for three depth cues--namely stereo, texture, and outline--between surgeons and medical students. Greater dominance on stereo for medical students was a positive finding and a negative finding for the surgeons when correlated with surgical performance.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that surgeons learn to adapt to the nonstereo environment in MIS, and this is the first study to show evidence of this phenomenon. This difference in stereo reliance is a reflection of the experience that surgeons have with laparoscopy compared with medical students, who have none.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12802650     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9178-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.

Authors:  A Chaudhry; C Sutton; J Wood; R Stone; R McCloy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  MIST VR. A laparoscopic surgery procedures trainer and evaluator.

Authors:  C Sutton; R McCloy; A Middlebrook; P Chater; M Wilson; R Stone
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1997

3.  The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  A M Derossis; J Bothwell; H H Sigman; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  MIST VR: a virtual reality trainer for laparoscopic surgery assesses performance.

Authors:  M S Wilson; A Middlebrook; C Sutton; R Stone; R F McCloy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout.

Authors:  N Bruno; J E Cutting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-06

6.  Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges.

Authors:  D Buckley; J P Frisby
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The validity of the Frisby stereotest as a measure of precise stereoacuity.

Authors:  J Rosner; G D Clift
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1984-07

8.  Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  N Taffinder; C Sutton; R J Fishwick; I C McManus; A Darzi
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1998

9.  The laparoscopic learning curve.

Authors:  M Lekawa; S J Shapiro; L A Gordon; J Rothbart; J R Hiatt
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-12
  9 in total
  24 in total

1.  3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.

Authors:  Pirmin Storz; Gerhard F Buess; Wolfgang Kunert; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Performance on a virtual reality angled laparoscope task correlates with spatial ability of trainees.

Authors:  Rachel Rosenthal; Christian Hamel; Daniel Oertli; Nicolas Demartines; Walter A Gantert
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  [Simulation of laparoscopic surgery--four years' experience at the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Marburg].

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Thomas Osei-Agymang; Daniela Radu; Berthold Gerdes; Matthias Rothmund; Emilio Domínguez Fernández
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  [Surgical training using simulator. Virtual reality].

Authors:  K Maschuw; I Hassan; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  3D presentation in surgery: a review of technology and adverse effects.

Authors:  Tianqi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-12-15

6.  Minilaparoscopy-assisted transrectal low anterior resection (LAR): a preliminary study.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Cedric Adelsdorfer; Salvadora Delgado; Patricia Sylla; David W Rattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of examinees' stereopsis and near visual acuity on laparoscopic virtual reality performance.

Authors:  Henry Hoffmann; Rebecca Ruiz-Schirinzi; David Goldblum; Salome Dell-Kuster; Daniel Oertli; Dieter Hahnloser; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Learning Kinematic Constraints in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Carla M Pugh; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.487

9.  Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).

Authors:  Likun Zhang; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Woojin Ahn; Cristol Grosdemouge; Jesse M Rideout; Scott K Epstein; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: "down-to-up" total mesorectal excision (TME)--short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases.

Authors:  Antonio M de Lacy; David W Rattner; Cedric Adelsdorfer; Marta M Tasende; María Fernández; Salvadora Delgado; Patricia Sylla; Graciela Martínez-Palli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.