Literature DB >> 8694945

The use of a modular skills center for the maintenance of laparoscopic skills.

S J Shapiro1, M Paz-Partlow, L Daykhovsky, L A Gordon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A reliable method supplying graduated experience and practice is needed to develop and refine laparoscopic skills. The laparoscopic surgeon, like the microvascular surgeon, must have ongoing training to refine and maintain his or her skills.
METHODS: The authors describe a new modular training unit. The unit consists of a box with a built-in television camera, a light source, and a rotating platform. A videotape recorder with a timing device documents the actual "operating time" required for the various exercises. The first phase of training consists of a basic skills board. This initial phase enhances the use of dominant and nondominant hand motor activity.
RESULTS: The surgeon then progresses to lifelike models (biliary, suturing, hernia, gynecologic) to simulate the human operative setting. Ten surgeons spent 5 h each working with the module. The specific exercises were recorded and timed. Their progress is described.
CONCLUSIONS: The modular laparoscopic skills center is an integral part of any laparoscopic educational program. It facilitates the acquisition and maintenance of laparoscopic skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8694945     DOI: 10.1007/bf00189541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Training, credentialing, and evaluation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  T L Dent
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  A cheap laparoscopic surgery trainer.

Authors:  M Mughal
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Endoscopy simulation training devices.

Authors:  M D Noar; N Soehendra
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  A new training device for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Sackier; G Berci; M Paz-Partlow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Establishment of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program.

Authors:  R W Bailey; A L Imbembo; K A Zucker
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Surgical simulation for general practitioners.

Authors:  I Capperauld; J Hargraves
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  The HysteroTrainer, a simulator for diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy.

Authors:  D Wallwiener; S Rimbach; G Bastert
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1994-11

8.  Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G Crosthwaite; T Chung; P Dunkley; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner.

Authors:  A Pietrabissa; E Scarcello; A Carobbi; F Mosca
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1994-12

10.  Training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Quantifying the learning curve.

Authors:  J G Hunter; J M Sackier; G Berci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  8 in total

1.  Analysis of the quality and efficiency in learning laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  K T den Boer; L T de Wit; P H Davids; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Determinants of competency judgments by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  G L Adrales; M B Donnelly; U B Chu; D B Witzke; J D Hoskins; M J Mastrangelo; A Gandsas; A E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [The GESRU Endo-Training - strategies for the optimization of endourological skills for residents].

Authors:  C P Meyer; J Salem; L A Kluth; N Sanatgar; H Borgmann; P Grange; F-K Chun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill.

Authors:  S A Fraser; L S Feldman; D Stanbridge; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of different training models for laparoscopic surgery in neonates and small infants.

Authors:  M Heinrich; N Tillo; H-J Kirlum; H Till
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).

Authors:  Likun Zhang; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Woojin Ahn; Cristol Grosdemouge; Jesse M Rideout; Scott K Epstein; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Assessing the value of the SimPraxis laparoscopic cholecystectomy trainer.

Authors:  Aldo Gamarra; Nancy J Hogle; Basem Azab; Scott W Bloom; Warren D Widmann
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  A systematic review of low-cost laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  Mimi M Li; Joseph George
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.