Literature DB >> 22978885

The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.

Matthew J Goupell1.   

Abstract

The role of envelope statistics in binaural masking-level differences (BMLDs) and correlation change detection was investigated in normal-hearing listeners. Thresholds and just-noticeable differences (JNDs) were measured for different bandwidths and center frequencies (500, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz) using Gaussian noises (GNs) and low-fluctuation noises (LFNs). At a 500-Hz center frequency, GN NoSo thresholds were higher than, NoSπ thresholds were lower than, and correlation change detection JNDs were the same as LFN thresholds and JNDs. At higher center frequencies, GN NoSπ thresholds were the same or higher than LFN thresholds and GN correlation change detection JNDs were much smaller than LFN JNDs. Using a pulsed sine vocoder, a second experiment was performed to investigate if binaural adaptation might contribute to the difference in GN and LFN detection. There was no effect of pulse rate, thus providing no clear evidence that binaural adaptation plays a role in these tasks. Both a cross-correlation model and a model that utilized the fluctuations in the interaural differences could explain a majority of the variance in the LFN correlation change JNDs.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22978885      PMCID: PMC3460981          DOI: 10.1121/1.4740498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

1.  The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; S van de Par; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: bandwidth effects.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Analysis of binaural detection models for dependence on interaural target parameters.

Authors:  R H Domnitz; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal weighting in sound localization.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The influence of stimulus envelope and fine structure on the binaural masking level difference.

Authors:  D A Eddins; L E Barber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Discriminations of interaural phase differences.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interaural correlation discrimination: i. bandwidth and level dependence.

Authors:  K J Gabriel; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

3.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.