Literature DB >> 22088041

Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Christopher A Brown1, William A Yost.   

Abstract

Listeners' ability to discriminate interaural time difference (ITD) changes in low-frequency noise was determined as a function of differences in the noise spectra delivered to each ear. An ITD was applied to Gaussian noise, which was bandpass filtered using identical high-pass, but different low-pass cutoff frequencies across ears. Thus, one frequency region was dichotic, and a higher-frequency region monotic. ITD thresholds increased as bandwidth to one ear (i.e., monotic bandwidth) increased, despite the fact that the region of interaural spectral overlap remained constant. Results suggest that listeners can process ITD differences when the spectra at two ears are moderately different.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22088041      PMCID: PMC3210184          DOI: 10.1121/1.3647263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Tuning to interaural time differences across frequency.

Authors:  D C Fitzpatrick; S Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Combination of binaural information across frequency bands.

Authors:  T N Buell; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interference in detection of interaural delay in a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone produced by a second, spectrally remote sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone.

Authors:  L M Heller; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency.

Authors:  W A Yost; R H Dye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

8.  Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Spectral overlap and interaural time difference sensitivity: possible role of binaural interference.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural enhancement for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Corrective binaural processing for bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.