| Literature DB >> 29548706 |
Daniel H Lee1, Justin M Aronoff2.
Abstract
Past studies have found that contralateral masking functions are sharper than ipsilateral masking functions for cochlear implant (CI) users. This could suggest that contralateral masking effects are only sensitive to the peak of the masker stimulation for this population. To determine if that is the case, this study investigated whether using broader stimulation patterns affects the broadness of the contralateral masking function. Contralateral masking functions were measured for six bilateral CI users using both a broad and narrow masker. Findings from this study revealed that the broad masker resulted in a broader contralateral masking function. This would suggest that stimulation outside of the peak of the masker affects contralateral masking functions for CI users.Entities:
Keywords: Bilateral cochlear implants; CI; Cochlear implant; Contralateral masking; ILD; ITD; Interaural level difference; Interaural time difference; MOC; Medial olivocochlear; NH; Normal hearing; OAE; OHC; Otoacoustic emission; Outer hair cell; SNHL; Sensorineural hearing loss
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29548706 PMCID: PMC5940546 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hear Res ISSN: 0378-5955 Impact factor: 3.208