Literature DB >> 29548706

Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Daniel H Lee1, Justin M Aronoff2.   

Abstract

Past studies have found that contralateral masking functions are sharper than ipsilateral masking functions for cochlear implant (CI) users. This could suggest that contralateral masking effects are only sensitive to the peak of the masker stimulation for this population. To determine if that is the case, this study investigated whether using broader stimulation patterns affects the broadness of the contralateral masking function. Contralateral masking functions were measured for six bilateral CI users using both a broad and narrow masker. Findings from this study revealed that the broad masker resulted in a broader contralateral masking function. This would suggest that stimulation outside of the peak of the masker affects contralateral masking functions for CI users.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral cochlear implants; CI; Cochlear implant; Contralateral masking; ILD; ITD; Interaural level difference; Interaural time difference; MOC; Medial olivocochlear; NH; Normal hearing; OAE; OHC; Otoacoustic emission; Outer hair cell; SNHL; Sensorineural hearing loss

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29548706      PMCID: PMC5940546          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  36 in total

1.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers.

Authors:  J H Mills; J R Dubno; N He
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Payton Lin; Thomas Lu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

8.  Efferent innervation of the organ of corti: two separate systems.

Authors:  W B Warr; J J Guinan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-09-07       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation.

Authors:  David W Smith; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  Correlation and Reliability of Behavioral and Otoacoustic-Emission Estimates of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Humans.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.