Literature DB >> 10573887

Quantifying the distortion products generated by amplitude-modulated noise.

L Wiegrebe1, R D Patterson.   

Abstract

When sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) is applied to noise or tone carriers, the stimuli can generate audible distortion products in the region of the modulation frequency. As a result, when bandpass-filtered SAM noise is used to investigate temporal processing, a band of unmodulated noise is typically positioned at the modulation frequency to mask any distortion products. This study was designed to investigate the distortion products for bandpass noise carriers, and so reduce ambiguity about the form of this distortion and its role in perception. The distortion consists of two distortion-noise bands and a distortion tone at the modulation frequency. In the first two experiments, the level and phase of the distortion tone are measured using two different experimental paradigms. In the third experiment, modulation-frequency difference limens are measured for filtered SAM noise and it is shown that performance deteriorates markedly when the distortion tone is canceled. In a fourth experiment, masked threshold is measured at low frequencies for bands of high-frequency, unmodulated noise with the same levels and spectra as the SAM noises in the earlier experiments. The results confirm that unmodulated noise also produces quadratic distortion which may explain some aspects of earlier reports on remote masking.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573887     DOI: 10.1121/1.428099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Laurent Demany; Stephan D Ewert; Stanley Sheft; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Neural mechanisms for the abstraction and use of pitch information in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wang; Kerry M M Walker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Masking of low-frequency signals by high-frequency, high-level narrow bands of noise.

Authors:  Harisadhan Patra; Christina M Roup; Lawrence L Feth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  I M Winter; L Wiegrebe; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Responses of auditory cortex to complex stimuli: functional organization revealed using intrinsic optical signals.

Authors:  Israel Nelken; Jennifer K Bizley; Fernando R Nodal; Bashir Ahmed; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effects of center frequency and rate on the sensitivity to interaural delay in high-frequency click trains.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Stream segregation in the perception of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Lena-Vanessa Dolležal; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.