Literature DB >> 24258458

The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Matthew J Goupell1, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

While bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) provide some binaural benefits, these benefits are limited compared to those observed in normal-hearing (NH) listeners. The large frequency-to-electrode allocation bandwidths (BWs) in CIs compared to auditory filter BWs in NH listeners increases the interaural fluctuation rate available for binaural unmasking, which may limit binaural benefits. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination and binaural masking-level differences in NH listeners presented a CI simulation using a pulsed-sine vocoder. In experiment 1, correlation-change just-noticeable differences (JNDs) and tone-in-noise thresholds were measured for narrowband noises with different BWs and center frequencies (CFs). The results suggest that the BW, CF, and/or interaural fluctuation rate are important factors for correlation change discrimination. In experiment 2, the interaural fluctuation rate was systematically varied and dissociated from changes in BW and CF by using a pulsed-sine vocoder. Results indicated that the interaural fluctuation rate did not affect correlation change JNDs for correlated reference noises; however, slow interaural fluctuations increased correlation change JNDs for uncorrelated reference noises. In experiment 3, the BW, CF, and vocoder pulse rate were varied while interaural fluctuation rate was held constant. JNDs increased for increasing BW and decreased for increasing CF. In summary, relatively fast interaural fluctuation rates are not detrimental for detecting changes in interaural correlation. Thus, limiting factors to binaural benefits in CI listeners could be a result of other temporal and/or spectral deficiencies from electrical stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24258458      PMCID: PMC3901860          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0426-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  64 in total

1.  Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis; M A Akeroyd; K Hartung
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The variation across time of sensitivity to interaural disparities: behavioral measurements and quantitative analyses.

Authors:  M A Akeroyd; L R Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The masking level difference for signals placed in masker envelope minima and maxima.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Susan E Boehnke; Susan E Hall; Torsten Marquardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies.

Authors:  Richard van Hoesel; Melanie Böhm; Jörg Pesch; Andrew Vandali; Rolf D Battmer; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Detection of binaural tones as a function of masker bandwidth.

Authors:  F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking-level differences obtained with a pulsed tonal masker.

Authors:  E R Hafter; S C Carrier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

1.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Internalized elevation perception of simple stimuli in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Counting or discriminating the number of voices to assess binaural fusion with single-sided vocoders.

Authors:  Jessica M Wess; Nathaniel J Spencer; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Large group differences in binaural sensitivity are represented in preattentive responses from auditory cortex.

Authors:  Angkana Lertpoompunya; Erol J Ozmeral; Nathan C Higgins; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.