Literature DB >> 26400253

Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Andrew D Brown1, Heath G Jones1, Alan Kan1, Tanvi Thakkar1, G Christopher Stecker2, Matthew J Goupell3, Ruth Y Litovsky4.   

Abstract

Normal-hearing human listeners and a variety of studied animal species localize sound sources accurately in reverberant environments by responding to the directional cues carried by the first-arriving sound rather than spurious cues carried by later-arriving reflections, which are not perceived discretely. This phenomenon is known as the precedence effect (PE) in sound localization. Despite decades of study, the biological basis of the PE remains unclear. Though the PE was once widely attributed to central processes such as synaptic inhibition in the auditory midbrain, a more recent hypothesis holds that the PE may arise essentially as a by-product of normal cochlear function. Here we evaluated the PE in a unique human patient population with demonstrated sensitivity to binaural information but without functional cochleae. Users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) were tested in a psychophysical task that assessed the number and location(s) of auditory images perceived for simulated source-echo (lead-lag) stimuli. A parallel experiment was conducted in a group of normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Key findings were as follows: 1) Subjects in both groups exhibited lead-lag fusion. 2) Fusion was marginally weaker in CI users than in NH listeners but could be augmented by systematically attenuating the amplitude of the lag stimulus to coarsely simulate adaptation observed in acoustically stimulated auditory nerve fibers. 3) Dominance of the lead in localization varied substantially among both NH and CI subjects but was evident in both groups. Taken together, data suggest that aspects of the PE can be elicited in CI users, who lack functional cochleae, thus suggesting that neural mechanisms are sufficient to produce the PE.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implants; precedence effect; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26400253      PMCID: PMC4737417          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00243.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber.

Authors:  C A Miller; P J Abbas; B K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-09

2.  The influence of spectral, temporal, and interaural stimulus variations on the precedence effect.

Authors:  Roberto M Dizon; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Inhibiting the inhibition: a neuronal network for sound localization in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Michael Pecka; Thomas P Zahn; Bernadette Saunier-Rebori; Ida Siveke; Felix Felmy; Lutz Wiegrebe; Achim Klug; George D Pollak; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

5.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  H WALLACH; E B NEWMAN; M R ROSENZWEIG
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1949-07

7.  Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Richard A Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of center frequency and rate on the sensitivity to interaural delay in high-frequency click trains.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Neural correlates of the precedence effect in the inferior colliculus of behaving cats.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Luis C Populin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Precedence based speech segregation in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Vahid Montazeri; Peter F Assmann; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory Brainstem Models: Adapting Cochlear Nuclei Improve Spatial Encoding by the Medial Superior Olive in Reverberation.

Authors:  Andrew Brughera; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; Mathias Dietz; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  Hearing Scenes: A Neuromagnetic Signature of Auditory Source and Reverberant Space Separation.

Authors:  Santani Teng; Verena R Sommer; Dimitrios Pantazis; Aude Oliva
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  A Temporal Filter for Binaural Hearing Is Dynamically Adjusted by Sound Pressure Level.

Authors:  Ida Siveke; Andrea Lingner; Julian J Ammer; Sarah A Gleiss; Benedikt Grothe; Felix Felmy
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  The precedence effect in spatial hearing manifests in cortical neural population responses.

Authors:  Kongyan Li; Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Chloe H K Chan; Ambika Prasad Mishra; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  Responses from two firing patterns in inferior colliculus neurons to stimulation of the lateral lemniscus dorsal nucleus.

Authors:  Xiao-Ting Li; Ning-Yu Wang; Yan-Jun Wang; Zhi-Qing Xu; Jin-Feng Liu; Yun-Fei Bai; Jin-Sheng Dai; Jing-Yi Zhao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.135

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.