Enzymatic activities in vivo occur in a crowded environment composed of many macromolecules. This environment influences DNA replication by increasing the concentration of the constituents, desolvation, decreasing the degrees of freedom for diffusion and hopping of proteins onto DNA, and enhancing binding equilibria and catalysis. However, the effect of macromolecular crowding on protein structure is poorly understood. Here we examine macromolecular crowding using the replication system of bacteriophage T7 and we show that it affects several aspects of DNA replication; the activity of DNA helicase increases and the sensitivity of DNA polymerase to salt is reduced. We also demonstrate, using small-angle X-ray scattering analysis, that the complex between DNA helicase and DNA polymerase/trx is far more compact in a crowded environment. The highest enzymatic activity corresponds to the most compact structure. Better knowledge of the effect of crowding on structure and activity will enhance mechanistic insight beyond information obtained from NMR and X-ray structures.
Enzymatic activities in vivo occur in a crowded environment composed of many macromolecules. This environment influences DNA replication by increasing the concentration of the constituents, desolvation, decreasing the degrees of freedom for diffusion and hopping of proteins onto DNA, and enhancing binding equilibria and catalysis. However, the effect of macromolecular crowding on protein structure is poorly understood. Here we examine macromolecular crowding using the replication system of bacteriophage T7 and we show that it affects several aspects of DNA replication; the activity of DNA helicase increases and the sensitivity of DNA polymerase to salt is reduced. We also demonstrate, using small-angle X-ray scattering analysis, that the complex between DNA helicase and DNA polymerase/trx is far more compact in a crowded environment. The highest enzymatic activity corresponds to the most compact structure. Better knowledge of the effect of crowding on structure and activity will enhance mechanistic insight beyond information obtained from NMR and X-ray structures.
Enzymatic processes observed in dilute buffer are often assumed to represent those in the
cellular environment. However, most often this is not the case since the cell is filled with
macromolecules in high density, leading to macromolecular crowding[1]. The in vivo concentration of molecules in the cytoplasm is
between 50–400 mg/ml, ~70% being proteins[2]. Such crowding affects enzymatic activities both in vitro and in
vivo. It is not always feasible to study the macromolecules under cellular conditions. To mimic
“cellular conditions” inert crowding agents such as polyethylene glycol, dextran, and
Ficoll are often used. Proteins can also be used as crowding agents with bovine serum albumin
representing a common additive. There are–many examples of the effect of co–solutes on
the properties of macromolecules and protein–nucleic acid complexes[3]. These co–solutes are thought to mimic the crowding effect in the
cell that arises from DNA, RNA, and protein complexes. Macromolecular crowding and the thermodynamic
effects have been recognized since the 1960's by the studies of Ogston[4]. Notwithstanding the wealth of information on the effect of macromolecular
crowding, the effect of macromolecular crowding on structure-function relationships is poorly
understood. Macromolecular crowding stabilizes the native state of a protein by destabilizing the
unfolded state, thus compensating for the energetically unfavorable “folded”
conformation[5,6]. An experimental and computational analysis has examined the effect of
macromolecular crowding on structural changes between the folded and unfolded states of
apoflavodoxin. These studies demonstrated that the effects of macromolecular crowding on protein
structure are observable[7]. To assess the
interactions between DNA molecules Parsegian and co-workers applied osmotic pressure in ordered
arrays of DNA molecules and used X–ray diffraction to measure the structural
changes[8]. The osmotic pressure method they
developed utilizes the equivalent of the mechanical work (osmotic pressure) needed to bring
macromolecules closer in spite of their repulsive interactions and the chemical work (removing of
the solute) needed to concentrate the macromolecular subphase. In a different instance using
far–UV circular dichroism spectroscopy Stagg et al[9] showed the structural effects of elevated amounts of Ficoll 70 on
apoflavodoxin. The theoretical radius of gyration (Rg) of apoflavodoxin indicates compactness in the
crowded environment.There are limited reports on the effect of molecular crowding on DNA replication.
Previous studies revealed effects on several aspects of DNA metabolism among them: oriC
replication[10], blunt–end DNA ligation by
DNA ligase[11], activities of phage T4 DNA
kinase[12], the association of accessory
proteins[13], and the assembly of a phage T4 DNA
polymerase holoenzyme[14]. Macromolecular crowding
has also been used as a tool to detect interactions within the T4 replisome[15].In the present study we examine the effect of macromolecular crowding on the proteins
that mediate leading-strand DNA synthesis. Phage T7 has evolved an economical mechanism for the
replication of its DNA[16]. In contrast to
eukaryotes or even E. coli, where tens of proteins are required, in the T7 system
only four proteins account for the major reactions that occur at the replication fork: (i) the gene
5 DNA polymerase (gp5), and (ii) its processivity factor, the host encoded thioredoxin (trx), (iii)
the gene 4 helicase–primase (gp4), and (iv) the gene 2.5 ssDNA binding protein (gp2.5). The
limited number of proteins enables: (1) reconstitution of a replisome, (2) determination of the
structures of functional complexes, (3) examination of the composition of active replisomes, and (4)
studying the effect of macromolecular crowding. The structure of interacting species within the
replisome is not known although extensive effort has been made in this direction[17]. Therefore alternative methods that provide low resolution
structure such as small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) are useful.
RESULTS
Macromolecular crowding reduces diffusion
A computer simulation of the random walk of lysozyme within the volume of an E.
coli cell in the presence or the absence of 18,000 ribosomes is shown in Figure 1a. Restriction of spatial movement caused by decreased
diffusion is observed in the crowded environment. One important consequence of this effect is the
stabilization of weakly bound complexes. In addition to the effect on diffusion, macromolecules
occupy between 5–40% of the cell volume. This volume is not accessible to other molecules and
the resulting effect is designated as the excluded volume effect[18] whose magnitude depends on the size of the molecule in question. Another major
effect of macromolecular crowding is solvent entropy. In a mixture of macromolecules and smaller
molecular components the loss of entropy of the large molecules is compensated by the gain in
entropy of the smaller molecules. Thus, desolvation around macromolecules enhances the entropy that
compensates for the loss in the conformational entropy that accompanies folding or complex formation
(for review see[19]).
Figure 1
Effects of macromolecular crowding
(a) Random walk in a crowded environment. Simulation for random walk (red) of a 30
kDa protein in the presence (upper panel) or absence (bottom panel) of 18,000 ribosomes as crowding
agents in a volume of an E. coli cell. The simulation was based on the calculation
of diffusion coefficient using the D=(kB T)/3πηd where kBT is scaling factor of
Boltzmann constant and the temperature, η is a viscosity value for the interior of an
E. coli cell = 3.5*10−3 Kg/m/sec[42], d the diameter of the particle used in the simulation = 30 Å. The
average displacement was computed as follows: A = 2*R*D*τ, where τ is the interval for
displacement= 0.0001 sec and R is the dimensions = 3. (b) Calculation of the volume that PEG of
different sizes (1, 4, and 8 kDa) occupies at different concentrations. At 4% (40 mg/ml) PEG 1 kDa
occupies 8% of the volume in a test tube; 4% PEG 1 kDa provides the approximate crowding effect
found in vivo[43]. (c)
Translational diffusion of 1mM lysozyme in the presence or the absence of 4% PEG 1 kDa determined
using DOSY-NMR. The logarithm of the relative intensity is plotted against the square of the
gradient strength ranging from 15 to 80 G/cm. The decrease in magnetization with increasing gradient
strength was analyzed using the equation : where D is the diffusion coefficient with , kB is the Boltzmann constant, T the temperature, η
the viscosity, F the dimensionless Perrin factor, rS the hydrodynamic radius of the
molecule q = γδg, Δ = 150 ms (separation of the gradient echo), δ = 2.5
ms (gradient duration), γ the gyromagnetic ratio of the nucleus and g the strength of the
gradient (ranging from 15 to 80 G/cm. Thirty two points were recorded in the indirect dimension.
DMSO was used as an internal reference.
The most widely used crowding agent is polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG is a
straight–chain polymer containing simple repeating subunits; PEG 1 kDa, used in the present
study, has 21 repeating units and is best modeled as a spherical particle[20]. PEG and other crowding agents can increase the rate of enzymatic
reactions[21], alter reaction products[1], protect macromolecules from thermal denaturation[22], accelerate protein folding[23], and facilitate nucleic acids renaturation[24]. PEG also induces precipitation of proteins at high concentration (30%)
and is used in protein purification. We calculated the volume that PEG molecules of different sizes
occupy at different concentrations (Fig. 1b). For example, at a
concentration of 4% PEG 1 kDa, 8% of the solution is occupied by PEG.Macromolecular crowding alters the binding properties and rate constants of a number of
enzymes including DNA polymerases. We have examined the effect of increasing the concentration of
PEG on the structure of the replication proteins and on the reactions they catalyze. To determine if
the macromolecular crowding effect of PEG is comparable to that found in vivo on
the diffusion of a protein, we used NMR to measure the diffusion of lysozyme (15 kDa) (Fig. 1c). The diffusion coefficient in the presence of PEG is reduced
13-fold, a ratio similar to that observed in cells[25].
Macromolecular crowding enhances the activity of the gp5/trx complex
The processivity factor, E. coli trx, binds with high affinity (5 nM) to
T7 gp5 in a 1:1 stoichiometry[26] to increase the
binding of gp5 to a primer–template 20–80–fold[26]. The increased affinity enhances the processivity of gp5 from less than 50
nucleotides per binding event to approximately 800[26] resulting in a dramatic increase in the macroscopic rate of DNA synthesis. We have
examined the effect of PEG on the polymerase activity of gp5 when mixed with trx in a ratio of 1:1
(Fig. 2b, left). PEG increases the activity of gp5 as much as
trx in the same molar ratio relative to gp5 (Fig. 2b,
right).
Figure 2
Gp5/trx polymerase activity and macromolecular crowding
(a) T7 DNA polymerase (gp5, yellow) bound to its processivity factor E.
coli thioredoxin (trx, red) polymerizes nucleotides continuously on the leading strand. The
crystal structure of gp5/trx bound to primer template and an incoming nucleotide (PDB id code:
1t8e[34]) in a view from the side. The figure was
created using PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org). (b) Polymerase
activity of gp5 with increasing amounts of trx (right). The activity was measured in a standard
reaction containing 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 50 mM
potassium glutamate, 0.25 mM dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and [α–32P] dTTP, 20 nM
primed M13 DNA, 20 nM gp5, and the indicated amount of trx. After incubation at 37 °C for 10
min the amount of [α–32P] dTMP incorporated into DNA was measured.
Increased polymerase activity of gp5 and trx premixed in a ration of 1:1 is observed as the content
of PEG is increased (left). (c) Effect of macromolecular crowding by PEG on polymerase
activity of gp5/trx in the presence or the absence of salt. Polymerase activity was measured under
similar buffer conditions as in (a). Gp5 (5 nM) was mixed with trx (25 nM) in the
presence of 300 mM NaCl (black) or in absence of NaCl (cyan). The error bars were derived from three
independent experiments.
We have shown previously that the activity of gp5/trx is reduced as the NaCl
concentration is increased from 50 mM to 300 mM[27].
At 125 mM NaCl, gp5/trx retains 50% activity. The high salt presumably masks the charged residues at
the DNA binding surface. We proposed that the difference in the behavior of gp5 and gp5/trx at high
salt concentration arises from a different distribution of charged amino acids on the DNA binding
interface. The binding of trx to gp5 leads to a conformational change leading to a different
electrostatic potential[27].We examined the effect of PEG on the activity of gp5/trx in the absence or presence of
300 mM NaCl, a concentration that diminished the activity and the binding of gp5/trx to DNA in the
earlier studies. Macromolecular crowding does not affect the processivity of DNA
polymerase[15] and indeed increasing PEG
concentrations result in only a slight (<10%) increase in polymerase activity in the absence
of NaCl (Fig. 2c, cyan). However, in the presence of 300 mM
NaCl there is a 3-fold increase upon the addition of PEG 1 kDa up to 4% where gp5/trx retains full
activity (Fig. 2c, black).
Macromolecular crowding enhances helicase but not primase activity of gp4
Gp4 is a multifunctional enzyme bearing helicase and primase activities in the same
polypeptide. We have used individual domains of gp4 to focus on specific activities (Fig. 3a, bottom). Gp4A (residues 1–566, 63-kDa) is the
full-length protein. Gp4B (residues 64–566, 56-kDa) arises from an internal initiation codon
and is present in phage-infected cells in amounts equivalent to the full length protein. Gp4B lacks
the N-terminal zinc-binding subdomain, an essential component for primer synthesis.
Figure 3
The effect of macromolecular crowding on gp4 activity
(a) Front (top panel) and side View (middle panel)of a gp4 model. Gp4 has both
primase and helicase activities in the same polypeptide chain. Subunits of the heptameric crystal
structure of gp4B (PDB entry 1q57[49]) were aligned
with the hexameric helicase fragment (PDB ID code: 1e0k[30]) and primase fragment (PDB entry 1nui[44]) of gp4. Schematic representation of gp4 constructs (bottom). The boundaries for
the helicase and primase domains of gp4 are depicted[45]. The three constructs containing the C-terminal helicase domain of gp4 are denoted
as gp4A, B, and D. Residue numbers are as indicated. The figure was created using PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org). (b) Effect of PEG on oligonucleotide synthesis by
primase fragment. The standard reaction contained the oligonucleotide 5'-GGGTCA10-3'
containing the primase recognition sequence, 200 μM [α-32P]-CTP and ATP,
and increasing amounts of 1kDa PEG (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10%) in a buffer containing 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.5), 10 mM MnCl2, 10 mM DTT, and 50 mM potassium glutamate. The quenched samples were
loaded onto 25% polyacrylamide sequencing gel containing 3 M urea and visualized using
autoradiography. (c) Effect of PEG on the DNA unwinding activity of gp4B. The DNA fork
depicted (right) was prepared by partially annealing a 5'–32P labeled 45-mer
oligonucleotide to a 65-mer oligonucleotide. DNA unwinding activity was performed in a standard
reaction containing 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM potassium glutamate, increasing amounts of
PEG 1 kDa (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8%), and 400 nM of gp4B. The gel shows the separation of
unwound ssDNA (bottom) from the dsDNA substrate in a 10% non-denaturing gel. (d) Effect
of highly crowding conditions (8% PEG) on the DNA-dependent dTTPase activity of gp4B. The dTTPase
activity was measured in the presence of 5 mM dTTP and 8% PEG and with various concentrations of
gp4B (0–200 nM). Difference in the dTTPase activity in the presence and absence of high
concentration of PEG is denoted as residual.
The effect of macromolecular crowding on primase and helicase activities was examined
(Fig. 3b–d). On a DNA template containing the primase
recognition site 5'-GGGTC-3' the primase fragment catalyzes the synthesis of the di-, tri-, and
tetraribonucleotides pppAC, pppACC, and pppACCC[28].
We examined the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides in the presence of PEG. The reaction conditions
involve incubating the primase fragment (gp4, residues 1–271, 30-kDa) with an oligonucleotide
containing a primase recognition sequence, [α-32P] CTP, and ATP, and increasing
amounts of PEG (0–10%). The radioactively labeled oligoribonucleotide are separated on a
denaturing polyacrylamide gel and the radioactivity measured on an autoradiogram. Macromolecular
crowding does not affect tetramer synthesis but slightly enhances trinucleotide formation (Fig. 3b). In the unwinding assay a radiolabeled DNA strand partially
annealed to a complementary strand creates a fork structure (see cartoon in Fig. 3c). Unwinding of the DNA releases the radiolabeled strand that has a mobility
in 10% TBE gels greater than that of the fork structure. In the experiment (Fig. 3c) the DNA was incubated with 400 nM gp4B, dTTP, and increasing amounts of PEG
1 kDa (0 – 8%). Increasing amounts of PEG results in enhancement of unwinding activity as
observed by the radiolabeled DNA strand that migrates more rapidly than the fork substrate.
Concentrations of PEG higher than 4% result in protein precipitation (Fig. 3c, lane 8).The DNA-dependent dTTP hydrolysis activity of gp4B in 8% PEG was examined (Fig. 3d). At this high concentration of PEG the dTTP hydrolysis
activity of gp4B is enhanced up to 70 nM of the enzyme. The dotted line represents the theoretical
activity taking the excluded volume effect of PEG into account. The activity in the presence of PEG
is higher than that predicted, suggesting that excluded volume is not the only factor contributing
to the increased activity. Increasing amounts of PEG enhances not only the DNA dependent dTTPase
activity but also the DNA–independent dTTPase (Supplementary Fig. S1b), presumably due to an enhancement of oligomerization of
gp4B.
Macromolecular crowding enhances the concerted activity of gp4 and gp5/trx
Leading- and lagging-strand synthesis involves interactions between gp5/trx and the
helicase and primase. On the leading-strand the helicase activity unwinds the DNA ahead of gp5/trx
to which it is tightly bound. The effect of PEG on leading-strand synthesis was measured using
circular M13 DNA containing a replication fork (Fig.4a, top).
Gp5/trx and gp4B (helicase but no primase activity) carry out strand-displacement synthesis (Fig. 4a). The addition of increasing amounts of PEG increases the
rate of DNA synthesis with a 3-fold increase occurring at 4% PEG.
Figure 4
The effect of macromolecular crowding on gp5/trx and gp4 interactions
The three proteins move the replication fork at a rate of approximately 150 nt/sec at 25 degrees.
The bifunctional gene 4 helicase-primase (gp4) assembles on the lagging-strand as a hexamer where it
forms a complex with gp5/trx and unwinds the DNA duplex. (a) Effect of PEG on
strand-displacement DNA synthesis mediated by gp5/trx and gene 4 helicase (gp4B). Using M13 dsDNA
with a 5' ssDNA tail (top), the efficiency of strand-displacement DNA synthesis in the presence of
PEG was determined. The standard reaction contained the dsM13 template (10 nM), 0.3 mM dATP, dGTP,
dCTP and [α–32P] dTTP (0.1 μCi), 10 nM gp5/trx, 200 nM monomeric
concentrations of gp4B, and increasing amounts of PEG 1 kDa (0–8%). After incubation for 30
min at 37 °C and the amount of DNA synthesis was determined by the amount of
[α–32P] dTTP incorporated into DNA. (b) Primase-dependent DNA
synthesis. The reaction was similar to (a) except that gp4A replaced gp4B and 10 nM M13
ssDNA replaced the dsM13 DNA. The reaction buffer also contained ATP and CTP (100 μM each).
The amounts of primase-dependent DNA synthesis was determined by measuring the incorporation of
[32P] dTMP into DNA. The error bars were derived from three independent experiments.
Lagging-strand synthesis requires gp4A, the full length gp4, for the synthesis of
olioribonucleotides to initiate the synthesis of Okazaki fragments[28]. To examine the synthesis of primers and their transfer to gp5/trx we have
used M13 ssDNA for the primase to synthesize oligoribonucleotides and for gp5/trx to extend the
primers (Fig.4b, top). In this assay, the full-length gp4
(gp4A) was used. To initiate DNA synthesis the primase must first synthesize tetraribonucleotides on
the DNA and then transfer them to gp5/trx. ATP and CTP are provided in addition to the four dNTPs
since the primers synthesized are pppACCC, pppACAC, and pppACCA. As shown in Figure 4b primase-dependent DNA synthesis increases up to 4-fold upon the addition
of PEG 1 kDa. However, oligoribonucleotide synthesis is not affected (Fig. 3b). The decrease of both strand-displacement DNA synthesis and primase-dependent DNA
synthesis at PEG concentration above 4 % is due to precipitation of the proteins (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Macromolecular crowding makes gp5/trx-gp4 complex more compact
During leading-strand synthesis gp5/trx and gp4 form a stable complex that increases
processivity[16]. Two interactions of gp5/trx and
gp4 are responsible for this increase in processivity. A tight interaction of the two proteins
results in a processivity of approximately 5000 nt. The processivity is limited to 5000 nucleotides
by the occasional dissociation of gp5/trx. A second interaction of the C-terminal tail of gp4 with a
basic patch on gp5 captures gp5/trx in the event it dissociates and allows it to return to the
primer, increasing the processivity to greater than 17,000 nucleotides. We have used SAXS to examine
the structure of this later complex and to determine the effect of macromolecular crowding on the
complex. Gp4D (residues 241–566, 36-kDa) is the minimal fragment of the helicase that forms
hexameric rings (Fig. 3a, grey). Gp4D contains the helicase
domain and the linker connecting the helicase and primase domains. Although gp4D has less helicase
activity than that of gp4A or gp4B it forms stable hexamers in the presence of ssDNA and dTTP and it
binds gp5/trx at the replication fork to form a stable complex[29]. All of the features of gp4D and its available hexameric crystal
structure[30] facilitate solution structural
experiments using SAXS. To assure the stability of the hexamer of gp4D we have used a 15 nucleotide
oligonucleotide to which gp4D binds tightly in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable analogue
β,γ methylene dTTP[31].It is crucial to ascertain that the complex between gp5/trx and gp4D can be identified
prior to the addition of PEG. Therefore, we carried out SAXS analysis on samples containing a
constant amount of gp4D but increasing amounts of gp5/trx. This procedure enables the detection of
weakly interacting high molecular weight protein complexes. We recently applied this method to
translation initiation complexes[32]. This method
also provides information on the stoichiometry of proteins within the complex. As shown in the
scheme presented in Figure 5a mixing of two interacting
proteins will result in an increase at the Rg values. The amount of one protein needed to obtain
saturation of the radius of gyration (Rg) value provides information on the tendency of the species
to form a complex. Thus, strong complexes are characterized by a sharp rise of the Rg value until
saturation with only small amount of protein that is titrated over the other, and vice versa. If the
proteins do not form a complex Rg value represent an intermediate value of the two.
Figure 5
SAXS reconstitution assay of the gp5/trx/gp4D complex
(a) Schematic view of the experimental design. Samples containing proteins A and B
are premixed in various ratios and placed in the sample cell. Rg values were extracted from the SAXS
data. Increased Rg values indicate that a higher order specie is formed. Intermediate Rg value from
the individual proteins in the mixture is indicative of non-interacting species.
(b–c) Small angle X–Ray scattering (SAXS) curves of hexameric gp4D (5
μM) premixed with increasing amounts of gp5/trx (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 μM). Raw SAXS data
(b) and the corresponding Guinier plots (c) for every sample. Colors indicate a gradual increase in
the gp5/trx concentration (red to yellow). (c) The Rg values for the complex formed
derived from these data and determined using Guinier plots. The insets in both (b) and
(c) represent the theoretical SAXS curves of linearly combined spectra (from the
available crystal structures) of the putative complex and the free proteins in solution. The data
represent a complex between gp4D and gp5/trx in a molar ratio of 1:2, respectively. The theoretical
SAXS curves of gp4D bound to gp5trx in a molar ratio of 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4, respectively, are
presented in Supplementary Figure S4.
(d) Scattering intensities (I0) shown as a function of concentration of
gp5/trx. Data presents scattering at zero angle of gp4D (5 μM) and increasing amounts of
gp5/trx (0–24 μM), corresponding to the amount of electron scatterers at any sample.
(e) SAXS results plotting the radius of gyration (Rg) against gp5/trx and gp4D ratios.
Experimental SAXS data were collected for gp4D (5 μM) and increasing amounts of gp5/trx
(0–24 μM) in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM potassium
glutamate, and 2 mM DTT. Gp4D was premixed with 6.6 μM 15mer ssDNA and 0.5 mM β,
γ methylene dTTP to form hexameric molecules. Radius of gyration serves as an indicator for
the formation of higher-order protein complexes. The dashed line represents a theoretical curve of
Rg values that would be obtained if the components did not interact.
The Rg values, corresponding to the size of the measured particles, were derived from
the Guinier plots (Fig. 5c) that represent the linear small
angle part of the X–ray scattering data (Fig. 5b). A
typical binding curve is observed upon plotting of Rg against the ratio between gp5/trx and gp4D
providing information on complex formation (Fig. 5e). The Rg
values are saturated above the ratio of 2:1 for gp5/trx to gp4D hexameric ring, suggesting at least
2 gp5/trx per hexamer (Fig. 5e).
I is proportional to the molecular mass (number of
atomic scatterers). An increase in I due to the
increase in the molecular mass is observed (Fig. 5d). There is
no evidence of aggregation from Guinier analysis (Fig. 5c). We
have linearly combined artificial SAXS data to merge the contribution of a theoretical SAXS signal
of the complex and the individual proteins (Supplementary Fig. S4). The artificial SAXS data was generated using CRYSOL[33] from the crystal structure of gp5/trx (PDB ID code:
1t8e[34]) and gp4D (PDB ID code: 1e0k[30]) and a model of the complex. These artificial SAXS spectra
serve as a reference for the reconstitution using SAXS to determine how many gp5/trx are bound to
one hexameric gp4D. The settings of a theoretical complex by which 2 polymerases are bound to one
helicase hexameric ring fit the data.The effect of PEG on the structure of gp4D and gp5/trx in solution was examined by SAXS.
No change in the Rg of gp4D or gp5/trx is observed upon titration PEG to the sample (Supplementary Fig. S3) indicating that there is
no conformational transition of the individual proteins by PEG.Rg of gp5/trx (without primer-template DNA or nucleotides) mixed with gp4D at the ratio
of 1:1 is equal to 63 Å (Fig. 5e)). This Rg value fits
well with the dimension obtained from a structural model of the complex constructed by the crystal
structures of gp5/trx and gp4D[29]. Figure 6 shows the Rg values of the complex formed with a mixture of
gp4D hexamer and gp5/trx at a ratio of 1:1 and increasing amounts of PEG (0–10%). Up to 4%
PEG there is a gradual decrease in the Rg indicating compactness of the volume of the gp5/trx-gp4
complex (Fig. 6). The results demonstrate conformational
changes in the complex as a result of macromolecular crowding.
Figure 6
The effect of PEG 1kDa on the Rg of gp4D bound to gp5/trx
The sample contained 4.5 μM gp4D (hexamer) premixed with 6.6 μM 15-mer ssDNA, 0.5
mM β, γ methylene dTTP and 5 μM gp5/trx. The reaction buffer contained 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM potassium glutamate, 2mM DTT, and increasing amounts of PEG 1 k
(0–10%). The Rg values for the samples were derived from the SAXS data and determined using
Guinier plots. SAXS Guinier plots at high PEG concentrations are presented in the inset.
DISCUSSION
We have examined the effect of macromolecular crowding on several of the reactions that
occur at the replication fork. Addition of PEG cancels the inhibitory effect of salt on the activity
of DNA polymerase (gp5/trx). This effect probably results from an increase in the surface of
interaction with DNA, an interaction crucial for increasing processivity[27].Traditionally reconstitution of the gp5/trx complex has used a molar excess of trx
although the reported Kd for trx binding to gp5is 5 nM[35]. It is now evident that the requirement for an excess of trx is due to
macromolecular crowding at higher protein concentration. The use of an inert crowding agent such as
PEG or bovine serum albumin can eliminate the need for excessive concentrations of trx.The active site in the helicase where hydrolysis of dTTP occurs is formed at the
interface of two subunits (Rec A-like domains). Consequently, the helicase hexamer has a total of
six active site clefts where nucleotides bind. PEG increases the efficiency of hydrolysis of dTTP
and unwinding activity of the helicase. Does the increase in dTTPase activity result from an
apparent increase of gp4 concentration? To answer this question we used 8% PEG to provide a high
crowing environment and examined the DNA independent and the DNA-dependent dTTPase activity of gp4B.
The apparent concentration of gp4 increased from 70 nM to 76 nM as the PEG concentration increased
from 4% to 8% resulting in a decrease in volume of 8% (see Fig.
1b). In this new apparent concentration of gp4 the DNA-dependent dTTPase activity increased
2-fold. Therefore, the increase in the DNA-dependent dTTPase activity is not governed only by the
increase in the apparent concentration of gp4B but also by an increase in hexamer formation.Macromolecular crowding affects the two activities of gp4 differently although both
activities reside in the same polypeptide chain. PEG does not increase tetraribonucleotide synthesis
by primase fragment while increasing helicase activity. Interestingly, primer synthesis of primase
fragment is not affected by PEG whereas utilization of ATP/CTP is increased (trimer formation)
presumably due to an increase in the affinity of the primase to ATP/CTP. The weak binding of the
primase fragment lacking the helicase domain to a DNA template has been observed previously using
surface plasmon resonance[36]. The molecular basis
for sequence recognition has not yet been elucidated. However, the negligible effect of PEG may
indicate transient association and dissociation of the primase to its DNA template, a process
affected by diffusion. In the context of the full length gp4, the priming activity is no longer
bimolecular, and therefore, the influence of crowding is expected to be negligible. The effect of
PEG on strand-displacement and primase-dependent DNA synthesis along with SAXS analysis of the
structures suggest that addition of PEG promotes the association of gp4 to gp5 to form a stable
replisome.Protein folding and protein–protein interactions are driven by the same forces.
These processes are governed by hydrophobic interactions (polymerization mode), salt-dependent polar
(electrostatic mode) and hydrogen–bond interactions. To adapt to environmental stress cells
have evolved an array of effective countermeasures. Osmotic stress is counterbalanced by
“osmolytes”, small, charged or polar solutes that balance the stress. One direct
effect of osmotic stress is that protein side chains are affected by water depletion[37]. Charged residues must search for other interactions when
water is absent leading to interactions with other charged residues. We have found, using NMR, that
the relaxation of protein residues is affected by macromolecular crowding presumably due to water
depletion (Akabayov et al., manuscript submitted).The loss of conformational entropy in a protein during folding or complex formation is
an outcome of the release of water molecules to minimize exposure of hydrophobic patches to
solvent[38]. Therefore water has a central role in
protein assembly and thermodynamics is the driving forces involving the motion of water molecules.
Release of water molecule by PEG increases the entropy that compensates for the decrease in the
entropy upon complex formation. The depletion of water from both DNA polymerase and DNA helicase
would presumably increase the contact interaction to DNA and alter the conformation of the protein
to enhance its movement on DNA.Another challenge is to characterize the structure of weakly binding protein
counterparts. Traditionally, attention has been directed toward the structure of stable complexes of
macromolecules. Most biophysical characterizations are dependent on the acquisition of a stable
species, a requirement not easily met with weakly interacting macromolecules. Interest in the
structure of weakly interacting components in complexes has risen significantly over the years,
particularly with regard to the high molecular weight transient complexes involving DNA replication.
Weak interactions between T7 DNA polymerase and gp4 are not short lived[39]. We assume that complex formation between DNA polymerase and gp4 remain
stable (although governed by weak interactions) to enable copying the entire genome.We have shown how SAXS can be used to probe high molecular weight complexes such as a
gp5/trx-gp4. The number of DNA polymerases in a functional replisome is not known. SAXS can provide
an estimate of the stoichiometry of gp5/trx on a hexamer of gp4D within a reconstituted complex. We
have used SAXS to determine the number of gp5/trx molecules bound to a hexamer of gp4 when neither
protein is in a replication mode. Such a complex represents that formed the replication fork and
involves the C-terminal tail of gp4 and a basic patch on gp5/trx. It is this complex that provides a
backup gp5/trx in the event that gp5/trx dissociates into solution, an exchange that assures
processivity. Our data supported by linear combination analysis of theoretical SAXS spectra show
that there are two DNA polymerases per hexamer of gp4.The leading- and lagging-strand gp5/trx are bound via different interactions and would
thus add two more gp5/trx to the replisome. Using this SAXS based assay we have determined the best
conditions for subsequent experiment with PEG. We have used a similar approach to characterize the
interactions between the C–terminal domain of eIF5 and eIF1[32]. This approach is not necessarily limited to SAXS. We have identified
interactions of Mn–dNTP to the active site of T7 DNA polymerase using X-ray absorption near
edge spectroscopy utilizing the same principle[40].
In the later experiment we were able to distinguish between signal originating from Mn2+
that is free in solution and Mn2+ bound to the active site of gp5. These methods together
with biochemical and other biophysical methods provide an opportunity to investigate the structure
of high molecular weight complexes that cannot be crystallized due to weak binding interactions or
have size limitations for NMR.Although there is considerable information on the effect of macromolecular crowding on
bimolecular reaction there is little information on its effect on the structure of the molecules
involved. FlgM, an unstructured protein. folds to adopt a structure in a macromolecular crowded
environment[41]. Likewise, the two unrelated
proteins: VlsE and α/β flavodoxin increase their structural content by folding of the
unstructured regions[7].We have shown that the complex between gp5/trx and gp4D adopts a compact conformation in
an environment with macromolecular crowding. We suggest that crystal structure or NMR solution
structures may not represent precisely the in vivo structure if no consideration of
the macromolecular crowding effect is taken into account.
METHODS
Protein expression and purification
Chemicals were from Sigma. ATP and CTP were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. dNTPs
were from USB Corp. Pre-made gels (10–20% linear gradients) were from BioRad (Hercules, CA).
T7 gp5, gp4, E. coli trx were overproduced and purified as described[26,46]. M13 ssDNA was
prepared as described previously[47].
[γ–32P] dATP (800 Ci/mmol), [α–32P] CTP, and dTTP
(800 Ci/mmol) were from Perkin Elmer.
DNA unwinding assay
The unwinding activity of gp4 was measured using a mini replication fork consisting of
5' 32P–labeled 45mer oligonucleotide
(5'–ATGACTCTATGCACATTGACATGCTTCAGATTCGTATTGTACACT–3') partially annealed to a 65mer
oligonucleiotide (5' T20AGTCGTAATCCGACCTCGAGGCATTGTCAATGTGCATAGAGTCAT–3').
Reactions contain 400 nM monomeric gp4B, 100 nM DNA, 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM DTT, 50 mM potassium glutamate, 1 mM dTTP, and the indicated concentrations
of PEG 1 kDa. The reaction was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C and terminated by adding
5× stop buffer to a final concentration of 0.4% SDS, 40 mM EDTA, 8% glycerol and 0.1%
bromophenol blue. Samples were loaded onto 10% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The amount of
radiolabeled single-stranded 45-mer formed was measured using a Fuji BAS Bioimaging analyzer.
dTTPase activity
The dTTPase activity of gp4 was determined in a reaction containing 0–200 nM
gp4B, 1 nM M13 ssDNA, 5 mM dTTP, 0.1 mCi of [α–32P] dTTP, 40 mM
Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM potassium glutamate, 0.1 mM DTT, and 8% PEG
1 kDa. After 10 min at 37 °C the reaction was halted using 40 mM EDTA and 0.4 μL was
spotted onto polyethyleneimine TLC plate (EMD). Reaction products were separated using 0.5 M formate
and 0.5 M LiCl. The plate was dried, subjected to autoradiography, and the products measured.
Oligoribonucleotide Synthesis
Synthesis of oligoribonucleotides by primase was measured as described[48] in reactions containing 5 μM T7 primase fragment.
Reactions (10uL) contained 5 μM DNA templates (5'-GGGTCA10), 200 μM ATP,
200 μM [α-32P]-CTP, primase fragment, 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM
MnCl2, 10 mM DTT, 50 mM potassium glutamate, and 1 kDa PEG (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10%). After
incubation at room temperature for 10 minutes, the reaction was terminated by adding an equal volume
of sequencing buffer containing 98 % formamide, 0.1 % bromophenolblue, and 20 mM EDTA. The samples
were loaded onto 25% polyacrylamide sequencing gel containing 3 M urea and visualized using
autoradiography.
DNA polymerase assay
Polymerase activity was measured in a reaction containing 20 nM M13 ssDNA annealed to a
24mer primer, 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 50 mM potassium
glutamate, 0.25 mM dTTP, dGTP, dCTP, and [α–32P] dATP (5 cpm/pmol). Gp5 (or
gp5/trx) and PEG 1 kDa were added at the indicated amount. The reaction was incubated at 37
°C for 10 min and terminated by the addition of EDTA to 40 mM. Aliquots were spotted on
DE–81 filters (Whatman), washed extensively with 0.3 M ammonium formate (pH 8.0), and the
radioactivity retained measured.
Strand-displacement synthesis
DNA templates were prepared by annealing a primer containing 5' non-complementary ssDNA
region (underlined) (5'–(T)AATTC GTAAT CATGG TCATAGCTGT
TTCCT–3') to M13 DNA. The reaction contained 10 nM template DNA, 0.3 mM dNTPs, 0.1 μCi
[α–32P] dTTP, 20 nM T7 gp5/trx, 200 nM gp4B, and the indicated
concentrations of PEG 1 kDa. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and the amount of
DNA synthesis determined as in the polymerase assay.
Primase-dependent DNA synthesis
RNA primers made by gp4A were extended by gp5/trx. The reaction contained 10 nM M13
ssDNA, 0.3 mM dNTPs, 0.1 μCi [α–32P] dCTP, 20 nM gp5/trx, 200 nM
monomeric gp4A, and PEG 1 kDa (0–8%). The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C.
and amounts of DNA synthesis were determined as described in the polymerase assay.
Small angle X–ray scattering (SAXS)
Measurements were made at the National Synchrotron Light Source (Upton, NY) on beamline
X–9. Sample loading, data collection and processing were performed as described[49].The magnitude of the scattering vector (q) is defined as:where 2θ is the scattering angleThe SAXS data showed a linear behavior (see
Fig. 5c and Fig. 6- except
samples containing 6 and 10% PEG) in the low q, Guinier region, indicating that the proteins did not
aggregate. Radii of gyration (Rg) were derived from data in the qRg < 1.3 region using the
Guinier approximation embedded in PRIMUS_ENREF_49_ENREF_47_ENREF_45[50]:To ensure binding of gp5/trx to gp4D we used samples prepared as followed. Binding of
gp5/trx (A) to gp4D (B) is a single step reaction of the type +
⇆ . The dissociation constant
is given by Where [A] is the concentration of gp5/trx and [B] is the
concentration of gp4D hexamers and [AB] is the concentration of the complex in
equilibrium.Expressing the equilibrium concentrations of the separate components in terms of initial
concentrations (indicated by a subscript Zero) and the concentration of the complex
We obtain If we wish to have x fraction of A in
the complex AB: Then the following amount of B is required to have
AB complex:
B, the concentration of gp4D was kept constant at 5 μM for all
samples. K, the dissociation constant is 90 nM[39]. Therefore, to obtain a 1:1 complex 5.3 μM gp5/trx
was mixed with 5μM gp4D. To examine whether binding of multiple gp5/trx occur per one hexamer
of gp4D, gp5/trx with various concentrations (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 μM) was added. The
components were mixed prior to the SAXS measurement, centrifugated for 1 min to eliminate scattering
from precipitated protein and measured. The samples of gp5/trx and gp4D were measured in 20 mM
Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM potassium glutamate, 2 mM DTT.To simulate the scattering profile and Rg for a mixture of gp5/trx and gp4D, we
calculated the scattering intensity using the following formula: with q= scattering vector, I0 is the extrapolated intensity at zero
scattering angle, Rg the radius of gyration of the respective particle.
The intensity at zero scattering angle was calculated according to where N is the number of particles per unit volume and V the volume of the particle
with: The apparent Rg of the mixture was then calculated from slope of the
curve of ln(I) vs. q2 according to the Guinier approximation:
NMR Spectroscopy
We carried out DOSY-NMR experiments using a stimulated spin echo sequence on lysozyme in
the presence or the absence of PEG to evaluate the effect of PEG on diffusion coefficients. The
decrease in magnetization with increasing gradient strength can be analyzed using the following
formula: where D is the diffusion coefficient with , kB is the Boltzmann constant, T the temperature, η
the viscosity, F the dimensionless Perrin factor, rS the hydrodynamic radius of the
molecule q = γδg, Δ is the separation of the
gradient echo, δ the gradient duration, γ the gyromagnetic ratio of the nucleus and g
the strength of the gradient. The duration of the gradient in this experiment was set to 2.5 msec,
the separation of the gradient echo to 150 msec. The gradient strength was varied from 15 to 80
G/cm. Thirty two points were recorded in the indirect dimension. DMSO was used as an internal
reference.
Simulation of Brownian Motion
We used Matlab to perform a simple simulation of Brownian motion in a space of the size
of an E. coli cell with and without ribosomes as crowding agents.We calculated 18,000 random positions of non-overlapping spheres with a radius of 11 nm
in E. Coli cell space (0.8 × 2 μm). We used the diffusion coefficient
with kB=Boltzmann constant, T=Temperature (293 K),
η=viscosity inside an E. coli cell with η=3.5*10−3
kg/m/sec43 and d = radius of the particle, here d=30 Å, to calculate the average
displacement squared with k = 2 Dnτ,where D is the
diffusion coefficient, n the number of dimensions (3)
and τ the time interval (here 0.0001 sec). The displacement vector for each time interval was
determined by multiplying a random number by the displacement factor using Matlab's randn function
for normal distribution of random numbers. If the new position of the molecule overlapped with a
ribosome position of if the position was outside the confines of the given space, a new position was
calculated in the same manner. For simplicity, the positions of the ribosome molecules were kept
fixed.
Excluded volume calculation
To calculate the excluded volume, we assumed spherical shape of the PEG molecules. The
specific volume was calculated using the following equation with rh=hydrodynamic radius, NA=Avogadro constant, MW=molecular
weight. To calculate the volume occupied by PEG at different concentrations, the specific volume is
multiplied by the density of PEG and the concentration. The values for the hydrodynamic radius of
PEG with different sizes was taken from [43].
Authors: Luis G Brieba; Brandt F Eichman; Robert J Kokoska; Sylvie Doublié; Tom A Kunkel; Tom Ellenberger Journal: EMBO J Date: 2004-08-05 Impact factor: 11.598