Literature DB >> 23410529

Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Danping Liu1, Xiao-Hua Zhou.   

Abstract

In ROC analysis, covariate adjustment is advocated when the covariates impact the magnitude or accuracy of the test under study. Meanwhile, for many large scale screening tests, the true condition status may be subject to missingness because it is expensive and/or invasive to ascertain the disease status. The complete-case analysis may end up with a biased inference, also known as "verification bias." To address the issue of covariate adjustment with verification bias in ROC analysis, we propose several estimators for the area under the covariate-specific and covariate-adjusted ROC curves (AUCx and AAUC). The AUCx is directly modeled in the form of binary regression, and the estimating equations are based on the U statistics. The AAUC is estimated from the weighted average of AUCx over the covariate distribution of the diseased subjects. We employ reweighting and imputation techniques to overcome the verification bias problem. Our proposed estimators are initially derived assuming that the true disease status is missing at random (MAR), and then with some modification, the estimators can be extended to the not missing at random (NMAR) situation. The asymptotic distributions are derived for the proposed estimators. The finite sample performance is evaluated by a series of simulation studies. Our method is applied to a data set in Alzheimer's disease research.
Copyright © 2013, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23410529      PMCID: PMC3622116          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrzej S Kosinski; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Decision rules guiding the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in two community-based cohort studies compared to standard practice in a clinic-based cohort study.

Authors:  David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider; Neelum T Aggarwal; Zoe Arvanitakis; Raj C Shah; Jeremiah F Kelly; Jacob H Fox; Elizabeth J Cochran; Danielle Arends; Anna D Treinkman; Robert S Wilson
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  An alternative method for estimating efficacy of the AN1792 vaccine for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  T D Koepsell; Y-Y Chi; X-H Zhou; W W Lee; E M Ramos; W A Kukull
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  Hua He; Jeffrey M Lyness; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.

Authors:  Ronen Fluss; Benjamin Reiser; David Faraggi; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.207

10.  Estimation of the disease-specific diagnostic marker distribution under verification bias.

Authors:  John H Page; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 1.681

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  ROC analysis in biomarker combination with covariate adjustment.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Clinical proteomic biomarkers: relevant issues on study design & technical considerations in biomarker development.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Akshay Bhat; Agnieszka Latosinska
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-29

3.  Prediction of Biological Motion Perception Performance from Intrinsic Brain Network Regional Efficiency.

Authors:  Zengjian Wang; Delong Zhang; Bishan Liang; Song Chang; Jinghua Pan; Ruiwang Huang; Ming Liu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.

Authors:  Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere; Kevin Wilson; Sara Graziadio; Luke Vale; A Joy Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Laser Doppler blood flowmeter as a useful instrument for the early detection of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in hemodialysis patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Takeo Ishii; Shizuka Takabe; Yuki Yanagawa; Yuko Ohshima; Yasuhiro Kagawa; Atsuko Shibata; Kunio Oyama
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Liquid biopsy in cancer using the Z-scan technique: a new approach to discover biomarkers in cancer.

Authors:  Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca; Glaucia Luciano da Veiga; Beatriz da Costa Aguiar Alves; Sarah Isabel Pinto Monteiro do Nascimento Alves
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-10-20

7.  Prediction of Aphasia Severity in Patients with Stroke Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Jin-Kook Lee; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Sung-Hee Park; Gi-Wook Kim
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.