Literature DB >> 6871349

Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

C B Begg, R A Greenes.   

Abstract

In the assessment of the statistical properties of a diagnostic test, for example the sensitivity and specificity of the test, it is common to derive estimates from a sample limited to those cases for whom subsequent definitive disease verification is obtained. Omission of nonverified cases can seriously bias the estimates. In order to adjust the estimates it is necessary to make assumptions about the mechanism for selecting cases for verification. Methods for making the necessary adjustments can then be derived.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6871349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  133 in total

Review 1.  [Methodology of diagnostic validation studies. Errors in planning and analysis].

Authors:  K Jensen; U Abel
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-09-15

2.  Evaluation of a computerized diagnostic decision support system for patients with pneumonia: study design considerations.

Authors:  D Aronsky; K J Chan; P J Haug
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Comparison of high efficiency CZT SPECT MPI to coronary angiography.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; Joseph M Sweeny; Lori B Croft; Maya H Barghash; Nitin K Kulkarni; Krista A Guma; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Optimization of PSA screening policies: a comparison of the patient and societal perspectives.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhang; Brian T Denton; Hari Balasubramanian; Nilay D Shah; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Y Loong; C Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Verification bias in a diagnostic accuracy study of symptom screening for tuberculosis in HIV-infected pregnant women.

Authors:  Colleen F Hanrahan; Daniel Westreich; Annelies Van Rie
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Clinical scoring for risk of resistant organisms in pneumonia: right idea, wrong interpretation.

Authors:  Natalie Bowman; Neela Goswami; Christopher K Lippincott; Michael J Vinikoor; William C Miller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  ROC curve estimation under test-result-dependent sampling.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Junling Ma; Stephen L George
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Toward better use of bone scans among men with early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Paul R Womble; David C Miller; Christine Barnett; Zaojun Ye; Susan M Linsell; James E Montie; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.