Literature DB >> 18680124

Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.

Hua He1, Jeffrey M Lyness, Michael P McDermott.   

Abstract

The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) is a commonly used index for summarizing the ability of a continuous diagnostic test to discriminate between healthy and diseased subjects. If all subjects have their true disease status verified, one can directly estimate the AUC nonparametrically using the Wilcoxon statistic. In some studies, verification of the true disease status is performed only for a subset of subjects, possibly depending on the result of the diagnostic test and other characteristics of the subjects. Because estimators of the AUC based only on verified subjects are typically biased, it is common to estimate the AUC from a bias-corrected ROC curve. The variance of the estimator, however, does not have a closed-form expression and thus resampling techniques are used to obtain an estimate. In this paper, we develop a new method for directly estimating the AUC in the setting of verification bias based on U-statistics and inverse probability weighting (IPW). Closed-form expressions for the estimator and its variance are derived. We also show that the new estimator is equivalent to the empirical AUC derived from the bias-corrected ROC curve arising from the IPW approach. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18680124      PMCID: PMC2626141          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.

Authors:  C Rodenberg; X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrzej S Kosinski; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Estimating disease prevalence in two-phase studies.

Authors:  Todd A Alonzo; Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Thomas Lumley
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C B Begg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Cumulative illness rating scale.

Authors:  B S Linn; M W Linn; L Gurel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  R Gray; C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 10.  Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.021

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Heang-Ping Chan; Carl J D'Orsi; Lori E Dodd; Maryellen L Giger; David Gur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Charles E Metz; Kyle J Myers; Nancy A Obuchowski; Berkman Sahiner; Alicia Y Toledano; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Prediction model-based kernel density estimation when group membership is subject to missing.

Authors:  Hua He; Wenjuan Wang; Wan Tang
Journal:  Adv Stat Anal       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.160

4.  Kernel Smoothing Density Estimation when Group Membership is Subject to Missing.

Authors:  Wan Tang; Hua He; Douglas Gunzler
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.111

5.  Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with first-pass dual-input perfusion CT.

Authors:  Xiaodong Yuan; Jing Zhang; Changbin Quan; Jianxia Cao; Guokun Ao; Yuan Tian; Hong Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Evaluating and comparing biomarkers with respect to the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in two-phase case-control studies.

Authors:  Ying Huang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 8.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Bayesian Estimation of Combined Accuracy for Tests with Verification Bias.

Authors:  Lyle D Broemeling
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2011-12-15

10.  Assessing the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Fangyu Li; Hua He
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.