Literature DB >> 19588455

Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.

Ronen Fluss1, Benjamin Reiser, David Faraggi, Andrea Rotnitzky.   

Abstract

The ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve is the most commonly used statistical tool for describing the discriminatory accuracy of a diagnostic test. Classical estimation of the ROC curve relies on data from a simple random sample from the target population. In practice, estimation is often complicated due to not all subjects undergoing a definitive as<span class="Chemical">sessment of disease status (verification). Estimation of the ROC curve based on data only from subjects with verified disease status may be badly biased. In this work we investigate the properties of the doubly robust (DR) method for estimating the ROC curve under verification bias originally developed by Rotnitzky, Faraggi and Schisterman (2006) for estimating the area under the ROC curve. The DR method can be applied for continuous scaled tests and allows for a non-ignorable process of selection to verification. We develop the estimator's asymptotic distribution and examine its finite sample properties via a simulation study. We exemplify the DR procedure for estimation of ROC curves with data collected on patients undergoing electron beam computer tomography, a diagnostic test for calcification of the arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19588455      PMCID: PMC3475535          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200800128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  13 in total

1.  Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrzej S Kosinski; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Evaluating multiple diagnostic tests with partial verification.

Authors:  S G Baker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Analysis of semi-parametric regression models with non-ignorable non-response.

Authors:  A Rotnitzky; J Robins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  R Gray; C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests.

Authors:  G Campbell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Electron beam computed tomography in the evaluation of cardiac calcification in chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  J Braun; M Oldendorf; W Moshage; R Heidler; E Zeitler; F C Luft
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  8 in total

1.  Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Nonparametric multiple imputation for receiver operating characteristics analysis when some biomarker values are missing at random.

Authors:  Qi Long; Xiaoxi Zhang; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Robust estimation of area under ROC curve using auxiliary variables in the presence of missing biomarker values.

Authors:  Qi Long; Xiaoxi Zhang; Brent A Johnson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.

Authors:  Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere; Kevin Wilson; Sara Graziadio; Luke Vale; A Joy Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.