Literature DB >> 23087495

Estimation of the disease-specific diagnostic marker distribution under verification bias.

John H Page1, Andrea Rotnitzky.   

Abstract

We consider the estimation of the parameters indexing a parametric model for the conditional distribution of a diagnostic marker given covariates and disease status. Such models are useful for the evaluation of whether and to what extent a marker's ability to accurately detect or discard disease depends on patient characteristics. A frequent problem that complicates the estimation of the model parameters is that estimation must be conducted from observational studies. Often, in such studies not all patients undergo the gold standard assessment of disease. Furthermore, the decision as to whether a patient undergoes verification is not controlled by study design. In such scenarios, maximum likelihood estimators based on subjects with observed disease status are generally biased. In this paper, we propose estimators for the model parameters that adjust for selection to verification that may depend on measured patient characteristics and additonally adjust for an assumed degree of residual association. Such estimators may be used as part of a sensitivity analysis for plausible degrees of residual association. We describe a doubly robust estimator that has the attractive feature of being consistent if either a model for the probability of selection to verification or a model for the probability of disease among the verified subjects (but not necessarily both) is correct.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 23087495      PMCID: PMC3475507          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  12 in total

1.  ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.

Authors:  C Rodenberg; X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Assessing the relative accuracies of two screening tests in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou; R E Higgs
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Jun 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Generalized estimating equations for ordinal categorical data: arbitrary patterns of missing responses and missingness in a key covariate.

Authors:  A Y Toledano; C Gatsonis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrzej S Kosinski; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Evaluating multiple diagnostic tests with partial verification.

Authors:  S G Baker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Analysis of semi-parametric regression models with non-ignorable non-response.

Authors:  A Rotnitzky; J Robins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data.

Authors:  A Y Toledano; C Gatsonis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  R Gray; C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Electron beam computed tomography in the evaluation of cardiac calcification in chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  J Braun; M Oldendorf; W Moshage; R Heidler; E Zeitler; F C Luft
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  4 in total

1.  Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Addressing the challenge of defining valid proteomic biomarkers and classifiers.

Authors:  Mohammed Dakna; Keith Harris; Alexandros Kalousis; Sebastien Carpentier; Walter Kolch; Joost P Schanstra; Marion Haubitz; Antonia Vlahou; Harald Mischak; Mark Girolami
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.

Authors:  Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere; Kevin Wilson; Sara Graziadio; Luke Vale; A Joy Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.