Literature DB >> 22822245

Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve.

Holly Janes1, Margaret S Pepe.   

Abstract

Recent scientific and technological innovations have produced an abundance of potential markers that are being investigated for their use in disease screening and diagnosis. In evaluating these markers, it is often necessary to account for covariates associated with the marker of interest. Covariates may include subject characteristics, expertise of the test operator, test procedures or aspects of specimen handling. In this paper, we propose the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve, a measure of covariate-adjusted classification accuracy. Nonparametric and semiparametric estimators are proposed, asymptotic distribution theory is provided and finite sample performance is investigated. For illustration we characterize the age-adjusted discriminatory accuracy of prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22822245      PMCID: PMC3371718          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asp002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  14 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  The central role of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in evaluating tests for the early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J A Hanley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Prostate-specific antigen and free prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: do combination tests improve detection?

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Seth Falcon; Peter H Gann; Charles L Kooperberg; David F Penson; Meir J Stampfer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P H Gann; C H Hennekens; M J Stampfer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  33 in total

1.  LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS WITH STANDARDIZED MARKERS.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Alexander C McLain; Colin M Gallagher; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  A regression approach to ROC surface, with applications to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Andrew Xiaohua Zhou; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Sci China Math       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.331

6.  Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Ying Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Development and evaluation of a genetic risk score for obesity.

Authors:  Daniel W Belsky; Terrie E Moffitt; Karen Sugden; Benjamin Williams; Renate Houts; Jeanette McCarthy; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2013

8.  Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs.

Authors:  Aasthaa Bansal; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  A parametric ROC model-based approach for evaluating the predictiveness of continuous markers in case-control studies.

Authors:  Y Huang; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in studies that match controls to cases on covariates.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Jing Fan; Christopher W Seymour
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.