Literature DB >> 23747153

ROC analysis in biomarker combination with covariate adjustment.

Danping Liu1, Xiao-Hua Zhou.   

Abstract

RATIONAL AND
OBJECTIVES: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is often used to find the optimal combination of biomarkers. When the subject level covariates affect the magnitude and/or accuracy of the biomarkers, the combination rule should take into account of the covariate adjustment. The authors propose two new biomarker combination methods that make use of the covariate information.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first method is to maximize the area under the covariate-adjusted ROC curve (AAUC). To overcome the limitations of the AAUC measure, the authors further proposed the area under covariate-standardized ROC curve (SAUC), which is an extension of the covariate-specific ROC curve. With a series of simulation studies, the proposed optimal AAUC and SAUC methods are compared with the optimal AUC method that ignores the covariates. The biomarker combination methods are illustrated by an example from Alzheimer's disease research.
RESULTS: The simulation results indicate that the optimal AAUC combination performs well in the current study population. The optimal SAUC method is flexible to choose any reference populations, and allows the results to be generalized to different populations.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed optimal AAUC and SAUC approaches successfully address the covariate adjustment problem in estimating the optimal marker combination. The optimal SAUC method is preferred for practical use, because the biomarker combination rule can be easily evaluated for different population of interest. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747153      PMCID: PMC3682803          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  12 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Effect of correlation on combining diagnostic information from two images of the same patient.

Authors:  Bei Liu; Charles E Metz; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A quadratic model for combining quantitative diagnostic assessments from radiologist and computer in computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Yulei Jiang; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.

Authors:  M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.445

8.  Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  On the convexity of ROC curves estimated from radiological test results.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  A min-max combination of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Chunling Liu; Aiyi Liu; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  9 in total

1.  Combination of longitudinal biomarkers in predicting binary events.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Ying Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Biomarkers for diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Toyin Omotayo Togun; Emily MacLean; Beate Kampmann; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Application of latent class analysis in diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease by serum markers after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Maedeh Amini; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad; Aliakbar Rasekhi; Farid Zayeri; Abbas Hajifathali; Farzaneh Tavakoli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Noninfectious influencers of early-onset sepsis biomarkers.

Authors:  Caterina Tiozzo; Sagori Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Normalized sensitivity of multi-dimensional body composition biomarkers for risk change prediction.

Authors:  A Criminisi; N Sorek; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Heat Shock Protein 27 is down-regulated in Ballooned Hepatocytes of Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH).

Authors:  Silvia Sookoian; Gustavo O Castaño; Romina Scian; Julio San Martino; Carlos J Pirola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Application of a Mechanistic Model to Evaluate Putative Mechanisms of Tolvaptan Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Identify Patient Susceptibility Factors.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Woodhead; William J Brock; Sharin E Roth; Susan E Shoaf; Kim L R Brouwer; Rachel Church; Tom N Grammatopoulos; Linsey Stiles; Scott Q Siler; Brett A Howell; Merrie Mosedale; Paul B Watkins; Lisl K M Shoda
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Association between 9-minute walk/run test and obesity among children and adolescents: evidence for criterion-referenced cut-points.

Authors:  Diego Augusto Santos Silva; Justin J Lang; Edio L Petroski; Júlio B Mello; Adroaldo C A Gaya; Mark S Tremblay
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.