Literature DB >> 20222937

A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.

Danping Liu1, Xiao-Hua Zhou.   

Abstract

In estimation of the ROC curve, when the true disease status is subject to nonignorable missingness, the observed likelihood involves the missing mechanism given by a selection model. In this article, we proposed a likelihood-based approach to estimate the ROC curve and the area under the ROC curve when the verification bias is nonignorable. We specified a parametric disease model in order to make the nonignorable selection model identifiable. With the estimated verification and disease probabilities, we constructed four types of empirical estimates of the ROC curve and its area based on imputation and reweighting methods. In practice, a reasonably large sample size is required to estimate the nonignorable selection model in our settings. Simulation studies showed that all four estimators of ROC area performed well, and imputation estimators were generally more efficient than the other estimators proposed. We applied the proposed method to a data set from research in Alzheimer's disease.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20222937      PMCID: PMC3618959          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01397.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.

Authors:  C Rodenberg; X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrzej S Kosinski; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data with covariates.

Authors:  R J Little; Y Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C B Begg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Decision rules guiding the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in two community-based cohort studies compared to standard practice in a clinic-based cohort study.

Authors:  David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider; Neelum T Aggarwal; Zoe Arvanitakis; Raj C Shah; Jeremiah F Kelly; Jacob H Fox; Elizabeth J Cochran; Danielle Arends; Anna D Treinkman; Robert S Wilson
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  Hua He; Jeffrey M Lyness; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias in clinical studies for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Zhou; Pete Castelluccio
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.

Authors:  Ronen Fluss; Benjamin Reiser; David Faraggi; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.207

View more
  6 in total

1.  Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A unified Bayesian framework for exact inference of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Kc Gary Chan; Haolun Shi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.494

Review 4.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Bayesian Estimation of Combined Accuracy for Tests with Verification Bias.

Authors:  Lyle D Broemeling
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2011-12-15

6.  Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.

Authors:  Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere; Kevin Wilson; Sara Graziadio; Luke Vale; A Joy Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.