Literature DB >> 21361890

Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.

Danping Liu1, Xiao-Hua Zhou.   

Abstract

Covariate-specific receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are often used to evaluate the classification accuracy of a medical diagnostic test or a biomarker, when the accuracy of the test is associated with certain covariates. In many large-scale screening tests, the gold standard is subject to missingness due to high cost or harmfulness to the patient. In this article, we propose a semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curves with a partial missing gold standard. A location-scale model is constructed for the test result to model the covariates' effect, but the residual distributions are left unspecified. Thus the baseline and link functions of the ROC curve both have flexible shapes. With the gold standard missing at random (MAR) assumption, we consider weighted estimating equations for the location-scale parameters, and weighted kernel estimating equations for the residual distributions. Three ROC curve estimators are proposed and compared, namely, imputation-based, inverse probability weighted, and doubly robust estimators. We derive the asymptotic normality of the estimated ROC curve, as well as the analytical form of the standard error estimator. The proposed method is motivated and applied to the data in an Alzheimer's disease research.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society No claim to original US Federal works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361890      PMCID: PMC3596883          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01562.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; William E Barlow; Gary Cutter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.

Authors:  M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Community screening for dementia: the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) compared.

Authors:  I McDowell; B Kristjansson; G B Hill; R Hébert
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  R Gray; C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of mini-mental status examination and revised hasegawa dementia scale for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  K W Kim; D Y Lee; J H Jhoo; J C Youn; Y J Suh; Y H Jun; E H Seo; J I Woo
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 2.959

6.  A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Discriminative and predictive power of an informant report in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  V Isella; L Villa; A Russo; R Regazzoni; C Ferrarese; I M Appollonio
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Rinaa S Punglia; Anthony V D'Amico; William J Catalona; Kimberly A Roehl; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.

Authors:  Ronen Fluss; Benjamin Reiser; David Faraggi; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.207

View more
  6 in total

1.  Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Ying Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  ROC analysis in biomarker combination with covariate adjustment.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.

Authors:  Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere; Kevin Wilson; Sara Graziadio; Luke Vale; A Joy Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A pair-wise meta-analysis highlights circular RNAs as potential biomarkers for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chen Li; Xinli He; Lele Zhang; Lanying Li; Wenzhao Zhao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.