Literature DB >> 23376018

Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery.

Kenneth S Henry1, Michael G Heinz.   

Abstract

People with sensorineural hearing loss have substantial difficulty understanding speech under degraded listening conditions. Behavioral studies suggest that this difficulty may be caused by changes in auditory processing of the rapidly-varying temporal fine structure (TFS) of acoustic signals. In this paper, we review the presently known effects of sensorineural hearing loss on processing of TFS and slower envelope modulations in the peripheral auditory system of mammals. Cochlear damage has relatively subtle effects on phase locking by auditory-nerve fibers to the temporal structure of narrowband signals under quiet conditions. In background noise, however, sensorineural loss does substantially reduce phase locking to the TFS of pure-tone stimuli. For auditory processing of broadband stimuli, sensorineural hearing loss has been shown to severely alter the neural representation of temporal information along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea. Notably, auditory-nerve fibers innervating the high-frequency part of the cochlea grow increasingly responsive to low-frequency TFS information and less responsive to temporal information near their characteristic frequency (CF). Cochlear damage also increases the correlation of the response to TFS across fibers of varying CF, decreases the traveling-wave delay between TFS responses of fibers with different CFs, and can increase the range of temporal modulation frequencies encoded in the periphery for broadband sounds. Weaker neural coding of temporal structure in background noise and degraded coding of broadband signals along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea are expected to contribute considerably to speech perception problems in people with sensorineural hearing loss. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Annual Reviews 2013".
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AN; CF; ENV; FM; SPL; SR; TFS; auditory nerve; characteristic frequency; envelope; frequency modulation; sound pressure level; spontaneous rate; temporal fine structure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23376018      PMCID: PMC3688697          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  46 in total

1.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Effect of auditory-nerve response variability on estimates of tuning curves.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measuring consonant identification in nonsense syllables, words, and sentences.

Authors:  David L Woods; E William Yund; T J Herron
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2010

4.  Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Louis Debruille; Stéphane Garnier; Pierre Fleuriot; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

10.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  22 in total

1.  Implications of within-fiber temporal coding for perceptual studies of F0 discrimination and discrimination of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Christophe Micheyl; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

Review 3.  Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception?

Authors:  Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Selecting auditory alerting stimuli for eagles on the basis of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Patrice Baumhardt; Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas; Todd Katzner; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Edward Bartlett
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Psychophysical and modeling approaches towards determining the cochlear phase response based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Hisaaki Tabuchi; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Jenna Browning; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Distorted Tonotopic Coding of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure with Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.