Literature DB >> 36134144

Selecting auditory alerting stimuli for eagles on the basis of auditory evoked potentials.

Benjamin Goller1, Patrice Baumhardt1, Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas2, Todd Katzner3, Esteban Fernández-Juricic1, Jeffrey R Lucas1.   

Abstract

Development of wind energy facilities results in interactions between wildlife and wind turbines. Raptors, including bald and golden eagles, are among the species known to incur mortality from these interactions. Several alerting technologies have been proposed to mitigate this mortality by increasing eagle avoidance of wind energy facilities. However, there has been little attempt to match signals used as alerting stimuli with the sensory capabilities of target species like eagles. One potential approach to tuning signals is to use sensory physiology to determine what stimuli the target eagle species are sensitive to even in the presence of background noise, thereby allowing the development of a maximally stimulating signal. To this end, we measured auditory evoked potentials of bald and golden eagles to determine what types of sounds eagles can process well, especially in noisy conditions. We found that golden eagles are significantly worse than bald eagles at processing rapid frequency changes in sounds, but also that noise effects on hearing in both species are minimal in response to rapidly changing sounds. Our findings therefore suggest that sounds of intermediate complexity may be ideal both for targeting bald and golden eagle hearing and for ensuring high stimulation in noisy field conditions. These results suggest that the sensory physiology of target species is likely an important consideration when selecting auditory alerting sounds and may provide important insight into what sounds have a reasonable probability of success in field applications under variable conditions and background noise.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. Elements of the work have been written by employees of the US Government.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36134144      PMCID: PMC9486983          DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coac059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Physiol        ISSN: 2051-1434            Impact factor:   3.252


  48 in total

1.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Brainstem origins for cortical 'what' and 'where' pathways in the auditory system.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Trent Nicol
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Beaked whale auditory evoked potential hearing measurements.

Authors:  Mandy L H Cook; René A Varela; Juli D Goldstein; Stephen D McCulloch; Gregory D Bossart; James J Finneran; Dorian Houser; David A Mann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Assessing risk to birds from industrial wind energy development via paired resource selection models.

Authors:  Tricia A Miller; Robert P Brooks; Michael Lanzone; David Brandes; Jeff Cooper; Kieran O'Malley; Charles Maisonneuve; Junior Tremblay; Adam Duerr; Todd Katzner
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  The Effect of Dynamic Pitch on Speech Recognition in Temporally Modulated Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Improving auditory warning design: quantifying and predicting the effects of different warning parameters on perceived urgency.

Authors:  E J Hellier; J Edworthy; I Dennis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response.

Authors:  G C Galbraith; P W Arbagey; R Branski; N Comerci; P M Rector
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-11-27       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Multi-modal communication: song sparrows increase signal redundancy in noise.

Authors:  Çağlar Akçay; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Comprehensive Bird Preservation at Wind Farms.

Authors:  Dawid Gradolewski; Damian Dziak; Milosz Martynow; Damian Kaniecki; Aleksandra Szurlej-Kielanska; Adam Jaworski; Wlodek J Kulesza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Field testing an "acoustic lighthouse": Combined acoustic and visual cues provide a multimodal solution that reduces avian collision risk with tall human-made structures.

Authors:  Timothy J Boycott; Sally M Mullis; Brandon E Jackson; John P Swaddle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.