Literature DB >> 18855069

The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Brian C J Moore1.   

Abstract

Complex broadband sounds are decomposed by the auditory filters into a series of relatively narrowband signals, each of which can be considered as a slowly varying envelope (E) superimposed on a more rapid temporal fine structure (TFS). Both E and TFS information are represented in the timing of neural discharges, although TFS information as defined here depends on phase locking to individual cycles of the stimulus waveform. This paper reviews the role played by TFS in masking, pitch perception, and speech perception and concludes that cues derived from TFS play an important role for all three. TFS may be especially important for the ability to "listen in the dips" of fluctuating background sounds when detecting nonspeech and speech signals. Evidence is reviewed suggesting that cochlear hearing loss reduces the ability to use TFS cues. The perceptual consequences of this, and reasons why it may happen, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18855069      PMCID: PMC2580810          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0143-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  51 in total

1.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 2.  Interference effects and phase sensitivity in hearing.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Factors affecting thresholds for sinusoidal signals in narrow-band maskers with fluctuating envelopes.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Some aspects of temporal coding by single cochlear fibres from regions of cochlear hair cell degeneration in the guinea pig.

Authors:  R V Harrison; E F Evans
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

10.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  105 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlear implants: the hazards of unexpected success.

Authors:  Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  Expression of BK-type calcium-activated potassium channel splice variants during chick cochlear development.

Authors:  Jung-Min Kim; Ryan Beyer; Marti Morales; Stephanie Chen; Li Qian Liu; R Keith Duncan
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

7.  Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments.

Authors:  João F Santos; Stefano Cosentino; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Adaptive auditory computations.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Jonathan Fritz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Fei Zhao; Yuebo Chen; Maojin Liang; Ling Chen; Haidi Yang; Hao Xiong; Xueyuan Zhang; Yiqing Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.